Saturday, 31 March 2012

On The New Deadwardians

      
There’s one shocking, despicable moment to be found in the first issue of Dan Abnett and I.N.J. Culbard’s The New Deadwardians. In fact, it’s one of the most inexplicable and dispiriting things that I’ve come across in a comic for a long, long while, and that's saying something. How much lower, you might ask upon catching sight of this aberration, can DC/Vertigo go? Because, and you’ll no doubt find this as difficult to sympathise with as I do, the cover to The New Deadwardians declares – deep breath, brace yourself – that this is the first of just eight issues. Yet if  ever there was a comic which demanded year upon year of uninterrupted publication, then this is it. Eight issues and nothing more is a scandal.

        
Without wanting to give anything away of the plot itself, much of the book’s strength lies in the way in which its creators have chosen to ignore so many of the givens of modern-era comics storytelling. They’ve presented us with an authoritarian, iniquitously unequal and yet ingenious and resilient society struggling desperately to cope with not one but two Biblically Fortean plagues, and yet they’ve done so in a way which avoids the over-familiar unless it’s been subverted to serve their purpose. Accordingly, the zombies of The New Deadwardians are no less terrifying than we'd expect as they munch away at their living prey, but they’re also a banal given of the cast’s everyday lives. There are procedures to be followed, phrases to be put to use, responses to be politely avoided when dealing with them. The end of the world arrived, it seems, only for the British class system to swallow it (almost) whole.

Abnett and Culbard sidestep the typical narrative affectations of so much of today’s fantastic fiction. They avoid both the melodramatic excesses flavoured by a hard-boiled, cod-Chandleresque world-weariness and the melodramatic excesses flavoured by a sub-Gamainesque whimsy. Instead, they offer a culturally repressed, profoundly private and understated cast whose emotions touch us far more because of what they don't say and do. When some expression of feeling does momentarily crack through their considerable reserve and resolve, it counts with the reader in a way which the typically obvious soap-operatics of  so much of 2012 's genre fiction cannot hope to equal. Less really is the new as well as the old more.

         
Don’t we all tend to try to pretend that a bedrock of routine and reliability still exists even when the very worst of times arrive? We all live in a world which perpetually totters on the abyss for an endless array of reasons, and yet we tend to think of our lives as remarkably ordered and predictable. Abnett's triumph is to suggest but never overstate the alienation and suffering of his characters in this fundamentally traumatised and yet apparently well-ordered alt-Britain, and it's an approach matching restraint with compassion which Culbard’s art works wonderfully well to compliment, creating a world in which horror is ever-present and yet almost entirely taken-for-granted too. It’s impossible not to care for these people because their experience of the world, for all its difference, is remarkably similar to that of our own.  

        
You might not be sold on the premise of a world in which the upper orders have by necessity embraced vampirism in order to survive a society-fracturing plague of zombies. But perhaps you might be interested in a series concerned with how we strive to create the illusion of normality even during the most unstable and challenging of circumstances, and with how we try to cope when denial and catastrophe collide.

        
A comic-book police procedural, a social drama concerned with class and family and authority, a rich alternative-Earth created from a compelling collision of history and horror, an untypically smart use of the supposedly idyllic and yet politically tumultuous years before the First World War, a very British chiller with welcome echoes of Brian Stableford and Kim Newman; The New Deadwardians feels like nothing less than a classic comic-book from the very off. It’s an achievement made all the more impressive because, save us, it’s concerned with yet more vampires and yet more zombies. To create something this inventive, unsettling and touching out of the beaching pop-culture obsession with the undead is a considerable achievement. 

.       

34 comments:

  1. You've convinced me Colin! I'll be sure to pick up a copy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Isaac:- It really is a fine comic-book. I didn't expect it to be, though I had no doubt that it'd be at the very least entirely competent. I'm just vampired'n'zombied out. But it's very good indeed, very smart. I hope you enjoy it!

      Delete
    2. hi colin:-"I'm just vampired'n'zombied out" well when there's a lot of vampire,zombie comics i think that everyone will make a comic/movie/TV show from it and it frustrates me that vertigo comics doesn't have anything new and interesting.

      Delete
    3. Hello H:- I do, as you know, agree with you about the ubiquity of vampires and zombies. And I agree why you'd want to keep them at arms-length. Yet I think it'd be a shame if Abnett came up with a great way of breathing life into the undead and suffered because of other people's work.

      I'd actually love to see a New Deadwardians TV show. But then, The Walking Dead is background noise to me and I'm not into the various vampire shows.

      On new and interesting Vertigo books; I did enjoy Saucer Country v. much.

      Delete
  2. That first paragraph made me laugh out loud. Now the other people in the coffee shop are looking at me like I'm some sort of weirdo. I mean, I AM some sort of weirdo, but I don't want them to know that!

    Thanks a lot, Colin!

    On the plus side, you've convinced me to to pick up this book.

    Thanks a lot, Colin!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Adam:- My apologies for any harm caused. I just thought it might be fun to play on the unfortunate fact that my last couple of blogs have regretably been rather negative. Well, very negative. And it IS a shame that there's just 7 episodes of the book left. I would happily buy a comic this clever and different for a great deal longer than that.

      I do hope you enjoy it. I always worry that a comic recommended may not appeal. But I think that it's at the very least very much worth a read, I do. In truth, I loved it. With Saucer County last week and now this, Vertigo's really on a roll.

      Delete
  3. I made myself a cocktail before I noticed you updated your blog and sat down for a drink and a read. When I first read, "There’s one shocking, despicable moment to be found in the first issue of Dan Abnett and I.N.J. Culbard’s The New Deadwardians. In fact, it’s one of the most inexplicable and dispiriting things that I’ve come across in a comic for a long, long while, and that's saying something." I figured we were in for in another long treatise about how morally bankrupt comics aimed towards the rump is and how it's began to infect even Vertigo titles. Then I read, "Yet if ever there was a comic which demanded year upon year of uninterrupted publication, then this is it." My first thought was the drink I made was stronger than I realized and I had misread it. Well played, Mr. Smith.
    And, similar to what others have said, you've convinced me to keep an eye out for this once it's released in tpb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Joe:- Thank you. There is such a thing, of course, as the blogger who protests too much, and so very often :) I thought it was way since time I expressed some unrestrained positivity, and fortunately TND was around and entirely deserving of such.

      I hope you enjoy the trade when it comes your way :)

      Delete
  4. I would have most likely ignored this comic if not for this post. Now I'm adding it to The List. Of course, The List is several mental pages long (and I still haven't found a cheap enough copy of Jack Staff), do it might be some time before I get to TND, but I have some time before the release of the trade.

    In positive list news, I just got copies of Fun Home and Alice in Sunderland on the cheap. I'm 2/3 through the former (and it's living up to the acclaim) and can't wait to dive into the latter. The one good thing about not buying comics regularly? I can focus my time and money on the stuff I really want.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello there:- I think we all rely on recomendations. I certainly do. For all that it's hard to believe that some aspects of the comics industry can survive, the medium as a whole just keeps throwing SO much that's worth reading. My list is as intimidatingly long as yours. Now it's longer, because you've reminded me that Fun Home belongs on it :)

      Delete
    2. Argh, I forgot to sign my name above! That's me:

      -Mike Loughlin

      Delete
    3. Hello Mike:- Ah, that makes the recommendation of Fun Home - I've got AIS - all the more welcome. It'll be heartening to think, when it arrives, that that's a Mile Loughlin suggestion. Thanks :)

      Delete
  5. Brilliantly understated emotions - I have always wondered is that a English/British trait? None of the American writers I have read have it. Yet so many British writers I admire - Doyle, Jim Corbett, Gerald Durell, James Harriot, umm I am sure I am forgetting a bunch - have it. You get the shivers especially when a Holmes shows emotion. :) :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello gl_hater:- You know, I don't know enough to say. I do know that much of that reserve is now gone, or at least seriously modified. When I was a lad in the 60s and 70s, there was still a great deal of that reserve in British culture. There's a lot less now, to say the least, but it's not done. As you say, it can still be seen in a great deal of British fiction, and your Sherlock example is a fine. Shivers indeed.

      I'd love to read a good study of cultures which share such a reserve; finding out where they differ and how they do so would be fascinating.

      Delete
  6. Hi Colin,

    Somehow I added Gerald Durrell to the list and James Herriot consciously modeled his stories on the Holmes stories anyway, so both don't count. But Jim Corbett! Imagine reading about a Man-Eating Tiger Hunt the way Doyle would have written it! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello gl_hater:- Two things I learned from your last comment. The first is the debt Herriot held to Doyle, which I never would have imagined. The second is the very existence of Edward James "Jim" Corbett, of whom I'd known nothing, and of whom I've enjoyed spending quarter of an hour reading up on. There's surely a movie in his life!

      Delete
    2. :) When friends asked for recommendation of Indian authors in English, I gave them R K Narayan and Corbett - telling them it pleased me very much to think of him as a honorary Indian. :)

      Delete
    3. Hello gl_hater:- From what little I've read of him, I believe Corbett would be modestly touched by the affection he's held in over your way. R.K. Narayan is an author whose work I know and greatly respect.

      Delete
  7. Hi Colin, top write-up. I hope that Vertigo orders a few sequels to this. I heard Dan Abnett telling iFanboy's Paul Montgomery that he'd like to write more, and explore the world beyond these shores.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- Thank you. That's very good news indeed about DA wanting to write more. (He's certainly a writer whose world-building abilities have been well-practiced.)I do hope that the book sells enough to generate a host of sequels. It's rare that I'm this enthusiastic about a book whose contents run right against my own tastes, or "biases". More please!

      Delete
  8. Oh, and talking of new Vertigo books, did you try Dominique Laveau: Vodoo Child? I'd love to hear your take.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- I wasn't particularly tempted by the art, to be honest, and then there were reviews of the book by trustworthy bloggereques - http://dangermart.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/dominique-laveau-voodoo-child-1-review.html - which suggested that limited funds might best be invested elsewhere. However, having enjoyed Saucer County and The New Deadwardians so much, I should give Vertigo's new wave a once-over as a whole :) (If I'd been a flunkey at the old Marvel, I'd've been titled "Suggestible Smith".)

      Delete
    2. Tell you what, don't buy, don't commit to a review, I shall send you my copy to cut out and keep!

      Delete
    3. Hello Martin:- Thanks for a splendidly generous offer. I may not cut out or keep, but I will let you know how good I thought it was.

      Delete
  9. I flipped thru this in the store and liked it well enough. And I'm a fan of most of DnA's comics. But then I saw its only a limited series. Not that there is anything wrong with a set ending to a story, its just that I've got more shelf space currently then longbox space, so I'll be trade waiting this one...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello LurkerWithout:- I certainly couldn't, and wouldn't, challenge your choice :) And I'm running short of longbox space too.

      I do think that I ought to buy single issues which I admire, given the moaning that I dish out when single issues aren't written to work that way. And it's no sacrifice, of course, when TND is so enjoyable.

      Delete
  10. Hi Colin,

    Like LurkerWithout above I am waiting for the trade paperback. When I saw it was a limited series rather than an ongoing I decided to keep within my monthly comics budget and offload the cost to my books budget (probably in a year's time when it is published in a collected form.

    That said, I am pleased to see it meets your approval. I read the pages included in Vertigo's 'new wave' preview booklet and thoroughly enjoyed it.

    I appreciate that you'd like an idea as good as this to an ongoing series but personally I think there's nothing wrong with a book which leaves us wanting more. Too many ongoing series lose their early purpose, promise and direction and the advantage of a limited run is that it retains the 'beginning - middle - end' functions and can be thematically tighter. If it's a big success and Abnett feels he can extend it further then I'm sure he'll write a sequel too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Ed:- I'm shocked to discover that the original reply I put up for your kind comment has since disappeared. (sigh) My apologies if it seemed that I was ignoring you.

      I do agree with your sentiments concerned with the virtues of comics which leave us wanting more, which make sure that what's in front of us is entirely entertaining. However .... the dreaded however .... I think we're really finding the skills involved in keeping books alive over a long period of time are disappearing. I think some of the greatest comic books were open-ended and used that to their advantage. I think there's much to be said about the closed model of writing, providing a story with a clear beginning and end. But I think that there's much to be said for the monthly which keeps going, twisting and turning and keeping the reader hooked.

      Horses for courses, of course :)

      Delete
  11. You know, I've been hearing (reading) good things about this book and I was in the store the other day, but...I couldn't do it. I mean, I'm sure it's good in an ironic, dandy, British kind of way, but I just couldn't bring myself to look into it in any great depth. I just never got into vampires or zombies or straw hats. And the art really doesn't do it for me either, which is a big deal for me. I admit I'm pretty shallow like that.
    So I was convinced to start on Daredevil instead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mayowa:- I'm not sure that TND is about an exclusively British way of behaving. I think all cultures contain stratas which to one degree or another tend to practice restraint, and we all have a habit of pretending that everything's normal when it's anything but. The prism might be Edwardian Britain, but I don't think the object that we're being shown is.

      Having said that, if it doesn't look or read as if it's something which you'd enjoy, then who could challenge your decision to leave it alone? And who could sensibly argue that Daredevil isn't a great book to be getting into? The shallow folks are the ones who read books because they feel they somehow ought to, the sensible ones are those who read what they want to.

      Delete
  12. Oh you tinker - nice switcheroo on the first paragraph. I'd spotted this a while back and have been looking forward to it, then I started reading the piece with growing alarm: Had Colin spotted some terrible fundamental flaw in the work?? Phew.

    I am grateful that I got my vampire/zombies in the Victorian-era story out of the way at the end of last year (as previously mentioned here) or I might be weeping into my Weetabix which never improves the flavour. Luckily, the vampire angle is only a minor part and they probably won't appear in any future stories set in the same fictional universe (I have one green lit and folks interested in others). However, it does mean I'll probably have to tradewait this so as I can get my ideas down, as this is bound to micturate on my pommes frites (and I'm going to love every drop of it too ;) ).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Emperor:- I am indeed a little tinkerer. Having written a series of rather - shall I say - negative reviews, I thought I ought to own up to the fact that I know I've been Mr Misery-Reviewer. And it was a delight to read The New Deadwardians and know that I was going to have a chance to blog about a book which I felt 100% excited about!

      I bet you are glad that you've already had your crack at this hybrid genre. It's good to establish a property before a comic as fine as this arrives. Yet if The New Deadwardians shows anything, it's that its not the components of a story which count but the tale itself. As I said in the above, I was not the market for this book, I had no interest in the high concept. Yet I was wrong. By which I mean, I look forward to the way in which you play with these genre conventions and I hope you'll let me know where your tale has and will appear.

      Delete
  13. this sentence made me laugh aloud: "The end of the world arrived, it seems, only for the British class system to swallow it (almost) whole."

    thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Carol:- Thank you! I tell you, the Edwardian class system could have swallowed up a plague of Aliens and Galactus too. They've have been ascribed a position in the stratification system and expected to be grateful for it too.

      Delete