Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Q Magazine And Me

       

I remember finding the first issue of Q. Rain on a grey autumn day in Richmond, a weary search for something to read on the train home in the poky newsagents opposite the ticket office in the station, and then a music magazine that I'd never seen before, and I read everything; Smash Hits and Blues & Soul, all four Inkies, Rolling Stone and Hot Press and The Face. I can recall flicking through this Q-thing as I trudged down the steps to the platform, I really can remember thinking that this was smart and fun and inclusive and perfect for the long, commuter-saturated journey home.

I've never stopped reading Q. There have been times when I've found it more or less interesting, but it's not something that I'd ever give up reading. There are things we do which are no more and no less than a part of the everyday bedrock of our days. I listen to the Radio 4 news as I awake, I read the Guardian over breakfast, I always look forward to new comics day, I'll always check out the new 2000Ad and I'd never not watch each successive series of Dr Who. And now it's more than a quarter of a century since I first bought Q, and I'm sitting in a garden far away in space and time from the drizzle of a West London Eighties October, and in front of me are two copies of the magazine's latest issue. One of them I picked up from a newsagent in a small Norfolk country town yesterday morning, one was added to the night's shopping by the Splendid Wife from a supermarket passed as she drove home from work. And there, absurdly, unbelievably, on page 119 of the May 2012 edition of Q is a new comics review column, and underneath its title are three words;

"by Colin Smith"

And that, I keep having to remind myself, is me.


           

I don't know what I could have possibly have said to the young and even-more-stupid me of 1986 if, by some impossible science-fiction conceit, I had the chance to travel back and speak to him. I wouldn't want him to know what was ahead, because he'd never have got out of bed and he had hard lessons to begin to learn which couldn't be coped with tucked up under the duvet. But perhaps, if I were in a sentimental mood, I might have just said that in another quarter of a century's time, he might just have a chance to contribute a comic's column to an issue of Q. And while just about everyone else on the planet might justifiably see that as a minor achievement to hang on for through 25 years and more, I think he'd have understood. In fact, I'm convinced he would have.

Do I sound sentimental here? I know I do. But there we are, some things round off circles that we weren't even aware of. Getting a chance to contribute to Q has been a tremendous experience. I look at every line I write differently now.

Alot of folks would see this as a matter of no importance at all. I absolutely understand that. But it's my by-line in this month's Q, and I'm so pleased to have had the chance to see such a thing come true. I can see it here in front of me now, on two different page 119s in two different copies of the same issue of the magazine.

Wonderfully, every time I look at them again, the article is still there. Reality, said Philip K Dick, is that which will not go away when you cease to believe in it, and I've doubted that such a thing could ever have happened so often that this must be real. So shoot me for caring, but I can remember the first issue of Q in 1986. It was a bloody awful year, and things wouldn't get better for a long, long, long time. But they did, and that's especially true now.


.

63 comments:

  1. Wow! Huge congratulations!

    Q couldn't have picked a better advocate for comics to the wider culture. Great news - well done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mark:- Thank you! Wow does seems an appropriate word for something so unexpected and unlikely :)

      Delete
  2. Congratulations, Colin! I don't think anyone will "shoot you for caring" - you're obviously pleased and proud to be published in the hallowed pages of Q, so shout it from the rooftops! Don't be so...English :-)

    Seriously, that's great news and I'm looking forward to reading your new column. I've been reading Q on and off since the first issue, and I've found their coverage of non-musical subjects ( books, films, whatever ) to have dwindled in recent years, so a comic column is welcome indeed. And to have it written by someone as knowledgeable and passionate about the subject as yourself is the icing on the metaphorical cake.

    Bang! Pow! Comics aren't just for kids any more! They're for music fans too...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello cerebus660:- Q's hallowed halls; that's how it feels. It doesn't do to be too reverent to any institution ... but it's Q, and I've always liked and respected Q.

      I really think you might enjoy the latest issue. It does have a fizz to it. I've no interest in saying that, the Q Police aren't monitoring my blog! But I thoroughly enjoyed it.

      Bang.Pow. Crash. We ought to have a sweepstake about when the next paper tells a story with that wearisomely familiar headline.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. Hello Rob:- You're absolutely right, fortune has been good to me :) Thank you.

      Delete
  4. I'll say it again......How proud am I?......The boy done good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Splendid Wife:- Why thank you :) I'll take the Hound Supreme down for the night then, shall I?

      Delete
  5. This is wonderful. Count me as another who remembers the first issue of Q, and stayed a devoted reader through the early years. I only regret that it became too expensive for me to continue the transatlantic habit...but even as a former reader, this news is still like discovering a friend has just been promoted to Mount Olympus or Avengers Mansion. And you should realize this places you in the literary company of Alan Moore, who wrote a few record reviews for them back in the early days.

    (P.S.: In the spirit of full disclosure, I speak as someone who once got a positive review from Q. I take their wisdom in publishing you as further confirmation of their good taste.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Richard:- I've owned up to my love of/nostalgia for NYC before, so you'll not be surprised if I find the idea of those early Qs being picked up your good self over the other side of the pond a beguiling on. I didn't remember - shame on me - that Alan Moore had written for the mag. Now I must see if I can track them down.

      Thank you for your kind words. I too have that sense of Q being ... something other & rather splendid. I feel like I've been given a chance to watch my team from a seat just a little closer to the pitch than would otherwise be true.

      I should think that Q should give you a positive review. Was it to Minutes To Midnight? I was consulting that just the other day :)

      Delete
    2. I want to say Alan Moore reviewed some then-reissued-on-CD Brian Eno and Captain Beefheart discs. However, my memory may be playing tricks on me here because those sound just a little too on the nose, don't they?

      The writeup I got from Q was for a Kate Bush fan website I worked on during my misspent youth (or 1996, as the calendar insists on saying). Q were always much more respectful of her than the rest of the UK music press ever were, or so it seemed at this distance.

      Delete
    3. What else need I, or any one else say but congratulations?
      Dina

      Delete
    4. Hello Richard:- You know, that rings a bell for me too. Alan Moore on Brian Eno? I know that Northampton's Bard interviewed Brian Eno for a Radio 4 programme a few years back; AM has, as of course you'll know, a huge degree of respect for BE.

      I recall the period in which Kate Bush was often treated with a fair degree of skepticism. Certainly in the 80s, the inkies often struggled with KB's music, though not in any way as a rule. Q was really important in breaking down that sense that these folks over here who like "x" can't like the music of those folks over there who enjoy "y". As the years have passed, as again you'll know, Ms Bush has achieved the status of a great lusty pagan icon. It's hard to find a tough word about her now, and it has been for a good while. So it should be.

      Delete
    5. Hello Dina:- Thank you! I do appreciate that :)

      Delete
  6. Congratulations, Colin!
    I'm extremely happy for you. Shall it be a regular thing?
    All the very best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello jamie:- Great to hear from you again, and thank you! It does appear to be a regular thing, though I'm desperately keen not to count my chickens.

      Delete
  7. Nice one, Colin. It can be really, really weird seeing your name and words in a publication you've read for years, but it's the best kind of weird. Q has always been a fine music magazine, and you will undoubtedly enrich it with more thoughts on comics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Bob:- You know, I hope - whether I'm there for one more month or an unbelievable two - that it always seems strange. I think I'm incredibly lucky to have one career behind me, although it didn't seem that way when I had to abandon it. Everything afterwards seems like a perpetually unexpected bonus, and I like that.

      Thanks for your kind words.

      Delete
  8. Great new, Colin, really great news! I've never read a comics reviewer more thoughtful and insightful, so I'm pleased that your thoughtfulness and insightfulness has gained you a - deserved - wider audience. Keep rambling about comics, my friend, and i'll keep reading - whether it's written in the internet ether or printed on dead trees!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello matthew:- Those are kind thoughts which are much appreciated. Now we're looking forward to how your Mexican demon-hunter prospers as the hard-copy comes closer. All the best!

      Delete
  9. congratulations, colin. i'm very happy for you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Carol:- Thank you. (And It's been fun swapping the occasional word or three with thee at the Cultural Gutter on Twitter recently.)

      Delete
  10. I don't think I've ever heard of 'Q.' It must be an English mag that just hasn't reached my little corner of the globe. I'd check it out and give you congrats if I could, but all I can do is just offer my congrats.
    But I promise I'll keep an eye out for it if I head down to the state capital any time soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Joe:- Thank you for your congrats. As a Brit, it's hard to realise that Q isn't sold right across the English speaking world. Here it's something that gets sold in supermarkets and petrol stations as much as newsagents and book shops. In fact, it seems it's sold everywhere over here except for the places that my Dad tries to find a copy ...

      Delete
  11. Great News Colin! Congratulations and good on yer! I'll look out for the issue down here in Oz.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Figserello:- My thanks to you, kind sir. Do let me know if there's an Oz sighting. I'm becoming curious to find out where Q can be found :)

      Delete
  12. Congratulations!

    May I suggest that after a few months of responsible, sober reviewing, you go utterly mad with power and spin off into eccentric rants about theory? Going utterly mad with power is an underrated experience. In the world of comic book criticism, you now have that power.

    WOO!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Harvey:- Thank you.

      And I can see that your suggestion is likely to bring about a long and successful career. I'd not have thought of it myself, but with your advice, I think the future will be splendidly successful.

      WOO!

      Delete
  13. So you're a sell-out at last, Smith - Johnny Rotten would turn in his grave if only he wasn't so busy selling butter.

    Well done on achieving a respectability long deserved!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Brigonos:- Selling out has never been the problem, Mr B. Having the chance to sell in has been what's lacking. Me and Johnny, we're of one mind, though he probably liked Van Der Graf Generator a little more than me.

      Thanks for the generous words :)

      Delete
  14. Congratulations, sir! That is very exciting! I am not familiar with Q, except by reputation, but I can imagine how it would feel to see my name on the byline of one of my favorite publications! You are a continuing inspiration. Any chance you can post a link to the article?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Historyman:- Thank you! It is, as I believe the younger members of this parish declare when exceptionally pleased, an awe-some experience. I'm afraid that Q doesn't print its content online as, say, Rolling Stone seems to. Perhaps your library system has a subsription copy somewhere in it? Sorry I can't help more.

      Delete
  15. Excellent!

    - Charles RB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Charles:- That's much appreciated. It IS a strange world, isn't it?

      Delete
  16. Brian Wiggett29 March 2012 23:35

    Congrats to you sir! A good friend of mine from college said he has always expected me to have a story in Rolling Stone, and that has never happened. Honestly, never really been pursued. But I can't quite imagine the giddy feeling opening up a magazine to your name would cause. And, as others have stated, to have such a literate and pleasant voice for comics for the "mainstream" world is a boon for all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Brian:- Thank you. It is a giddy feeling, and an entirely unreal one, you're right. I feel like I've slipped into an alt-Earth where the rules are subtly but fundamentally different and more favourable. I'm an exceptionally fortunate bloke and I do know that.

      I hope whatever dreams you do choose to pursue, great or small, pay off in the best possible way.

      Delete
  17. It's always great to see comics get a look-in outside the walls of our little enclave.

    I have to say, it does irk me that poetry, for instance, gets quite a bit of column space in all the wadgy bulk of the weekend papers, but comics get hardly any. Poetry is fine and all, but in terms of the number of people actually buying the product, surely we count for something? I know we are tiny in number these days, but surely more people buy and enjoy comics in an average week than buy poetry?

    It's an interesting question at any rate.

    Not that I've got anything against poetry. But I read a comic last week that had Superman lifting a Martian pramid from the Gobi desert and flying it back to Mars for J'onn J'onnz' funeral. What poem has anything like that?

    Do you think it might be a touch of cultural snobbery at work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Figserello:- I think in general there is a touch of cultural snobbery at work, but obviously not at Q! There are obviously other factors; there may be a mass audience for comics, but it's an audience which is broken into a mass of niches and that means that it doesn't carry a great deal of power in the mainstream. It's a terrible shame, of course, because "comics" refers to such a broad span of stories. It's the wonders of the Martian pyramid above the Gobi Desert which you quite rightly refer to and the intimate personal biography, it's an entire %*!$ medium. The popular prejudice may see super-people or children's books when they think of comics - and those things can be exceptionally cool at their best in themselves! - but that's to ignore everything else that the form gives us.

      By which I mean, I assume that there's vastly more people reading comics in one form or another than poetry. That isn't to suggest that poetry shouldn't get the attention it does! I'm a reader of poetry and the Splendid Wife would make it plain than any lack of respect here is NOT acceptable. And she'd be right. But nobody dismisses film and TV simply because kid's books and fantasies feature there, and if they did, they'd be thought of as an idiot.

      Come the revolution, brother Figserello, come the revolution ...

      Delete
  18. I decided to add my avatar to the post this time, when I saw 'please prove you are not a robot' as part of the posting protocols here. :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Figserello:- And the minute I see that avatar, I'm reminded of your words up on pages elsewhere :) Thank you for adding it.

      Delete
  19. Congratulations! They couldn't have found a better critic! I don't know where to score a copy here, but I'll be on the lookout.

    -Mike Loughlin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mike:- Thank you!

      I always thought that Q would have an America edition. I of course nothing of magazine markets, but it always seemed such an interesting business. America almost seems like a different country sometimes :) Rumour says that you folks don't even play cricket. This surely can't be true.

      Delete
  20. congratulations my friend and very well deserved. keep up the excellent work-it really is cool to see you get a spotlight with Q. it's so rare these days to find well written long form commentary...this is why i visit each day(and even comment some days :D).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Selkirk:- Thank you. It's cool to hear from you again. You're always welcome over this direction.

      Delete
  21. That's great news, Colin! I'm happy for you too! (I'll keep my eyes open for an issue at an international magazine stand near me... you never know what you'll find. And by 'you' I mean 'me', finding a copy of this mag!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Isaac:- Thank you! If you see a copy at that international magazine stand, the comics column is on page 119! And I'm pleased to be there :) I hope the day goes well for you.

      Delete
  22. Colin Smith, you join the music press and straight away you're letting loose with the %*!$s ...

    Hee, nice one, I'm chuffed to bits and will be buying Q and emailing copious praise, which I don't doubt the column will merit.

    I may be even more excited about seeing the Splendid Wife pop up, mind ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- Every word in Q is actually straight from the quill of the Splendid Wife. I'm taking whatever credit there is because of tax purposes. Several of our neighbours are covers for her pieces in Tax Today, Radio Times, and several Dan Dare fanzines.

      I wouldn't ever dream of writing those %*!$, but she won't hear otherwise.

      I will however gladly pass on your kind best wishes. Thank you.

      Delete
  23. Congratulations on publishing! This has long been one of my favorite blogs for cultural criticism, and I can't think of anyone who more deserves remuneration for the many hours of thoughtful enjoyment you've provided.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Simon:- Thank you. It's good to hear from you again. I hope the day is treating you well.

      Delete
  24. Colin,

    Congratulations! You must be chuffed to such a significant degree that the word uberchuffed must be coined. A selfish part of me hopes this won't lead to any reduction in output here, hmmm?

    I live in Australia, and Q can be found at many newsagents, not to mention specialist magazine stores and the occasional bookstore.

    (Also, dare I say that my inner pedant notes that should be 'Doctor' Who, not Dr, surely?)

    cheers
    Hugh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Hugh:- thank you! Uberchuffed is a great word. I think everyone should use it when appropriate, and use it so much that it becomes a taken-for-granted term. There are - the blogger said in his best government announcer's voice - no plan to reduce the frequency of posts on this blogs :)

      Thanks for the news that Q is avaliable in Australia. I have the comics fan curiosity about what gets sold where!

      One of the problems with remembering Doctor Who as "Dr" is I'm always missing things in searches. Anything that reinforces the "Doctor" helps me! Thank you.

      Delete
  25. Because it's so wonderfully absurd, I'm reproducing here a message from my oldest friend Dave T. sent via Facebook;

    "Conversation 1 hour at the barbers at the chair to my left was about 2000AD. I mentioned your article in Q and one of dudes had already read it - turns out that was why they were talking comics. Col, you have it confirmed now - you have touched others significantly outside of you normal sphere of influence!! Success!!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like you`ve brought the revolution a step closer, Colin... :-)

      Delete
    2. Hello Figserello:- It's a daft world, isn't it? Still, it would be heartening to think that 2000AD got one or two extra sales out of the column. It is going through a protracted "up" period at the moment.

      Come the revolution, brother, as Citizen Wolfy Smith used to say, though I suspect that that was WAY before your time :)

      Delete
  26. I very much enjoyed the column, nice one Colin!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- Thank you. You are, as always, an Egg.

      Delete
  27. "Power to the People!!" (to be shouted at the leaast appropriate moment for maximum effect.)

    Wolfie is one of my heroes! I was too young to understand quite how he was satirising the tail-end of a particular moment in counter-culture history/politics, but I still enjoyed the series.

    And that slogan is a powerful one, even though it was only used to show Wolfie's naivette, and somehow the inapplicability of the Marxist class struggle paradigm to Tooting Bec.

    To think that Wolfie Smith the suburban revolutionary grew up to be that boring middle-manager guy in 'My Family'. It'd make you weep!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Figserello:- Well, how splendid! A man who remembers, and fondly too, the struggles to liberate Tooting Bec. Power To The People indeed.

      Strange to think that Cheryl Hall, who of course played Woolfie's girlfriend, ended up as the Labour leader on Kent County Council. Or did I dream that?

      Delete
  28. Dear Colin

    Came home drunk one night and posted some heartfelt congratulations on your success. I am happy to see that the dismal paragraphs very mercifully went missing, so please accept these belated congratulations on your thoroughly well deserved and long overdue publishing triumph.

    I was impressed by your change of gear, the whistle-stop tour through some of the good stuff currently out there, the revved-up tempo as opposed to the long, luxuriant, scholarly pieces we are accustomed to reading here. I understand now why you were having difficulty editing the piece for length. Picture Michaelangelo quarrying away at his David until it's the size of a garden gnome.

    Brilliant, well done, delighted for you. Or did I mean 'luxurious'?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Marco:- Thank you!

      I'm still sorry, despite your apparent relief, that those paragraphs went missing. I've lost too many things on Blogger not to sympathise with anyone who's suffered the same.

      It seems odd to recall that we swapped words about my struggling to edit that piece before it was done, or rather as done as any such things can be. I've a huge amount of time for that revved-up tempo, I must say, and the discipline of trying to get things said and then moving on is, for all I'm still struggling with it, a fine one. I shall consider it "gnoming" from now on.

      Thanks for the generous words. (I do fear I'll need another few decades of practise before "luxurious" can apply, mind you :))

      Delete
  29. RE: Your new column.

    Well deserved.

    Well done!

    Matt Badham

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hello Matt:- Thank you! I do appreciate the good wishes :)

    ReplyDelete