The Short Version
You'd be doing me a very big favour if you'd take a moment and nominate any title or titles from next week's comics release schedule which you'd like to see reviewed at TooBusyThinking. The advance shipping lists can be found here and here. The "nominations" won't close until next Wednesday mid-day, 9th May, so anytime that suits you between now and then would be splendid for me.
The Slightly-longer Version
It's a somewhat risky strategy. It could all end in an embarrassing silence. But if I may, I'd really appreciate your help, and I hope you'll not mind my asking.
The problem's simple enough. My writing's just not good enough, though I'm not meaning to suggest that I'm suffering any great burden of angst about the matter. It's just something that I have to work at.
And so, when I look back at last weekend's piece about misogynistic comics criticism, for example, I'm disappointed by what a clodhopping slog it is. I hope its content has something of value, but its form just isn't anywhere near good enough. And though the little whiny excuse-monger in my head has a full set of misdirections just waiting to be played as get-out-of-jail cards - too little time, too much to say, a challenging subject, and so on and on - the truth is that the work just doesn't swing. It lacks wit, it's too stodgy, it's knee-deep in six-clause sentences. It does a job, but it's only a fraction of the job that it ought to be doing
Writing for "Q" has been a tremendous eye-opener. The expectations there are, by necessity, so constricting that they're counter-intuitively liberating. There's not a word to waste, and it constantly amazes me how much can be suggested, if not of course actually discussed, in so few sentences. Under that pressure, style starts to mutate not so much out of affectation as necessity. The job done demands that every word gets focused on, while the awareness that there's never going to be the necessary space for everything inevitably encourages a desperate kind of innovation. Choices have to made, favourite moments murdered, and those are quandaries that I need more of. Quite frankly, I've been writing four-sided prog concept albums when I ought to have been working on singles that have that have the final chorus wrapped up and fading somewhere between 1.50 and 2.20.
I've got all the freedom I could want to write my typical pieces both here and at Sequart, and I fully intend to keep taking advantage of that. But I really must start embracing less autonomy, and that's where you might consider helping out. I know it's a cheek to even suggest it, but perhaps you would consider nominating a comic or three from next week's release schedule for me to write about. What I'd love the chance to do is buy and review whatever - if any - the most suggested titles are by noon next Wednesday. The hope would be that there'd be at least one mainstream super-book and one comic from beyond the tightest of tight-underwear titles to talk about. It doesn't matter if those are comics which I've discussed before. It doesn't matter if one generous soul and one alone has suggested a single comic. The point is simply that the choice won't be mine.
The reviews themselves would be relatively short and hopefully sharp. As I said above, Q's taught me the value of restrictions. So, 150 words for the third choice, if there is one, 250 for the second, and 450 for the first.
In the unlikely event that there's something you'd like to see discussed here at TooBusyThinking, or if you'd just be willing to help a floundering blogger out, please do add whatever titles you care to below. (You're more than welcome to mention why you think a comic, for good or ill, is worth a visit, though I fear the budget won't run to graphic novels.) You can find a list of next weeks titles here and here, although if you use the latter, you'll need to scroll downwards.
You really would be doing me a favour. I've only some 2 000 hours left out of the 10 000 I set out to spend on this blog when I started, and it's about time I raised my game. Less choice, more restrictions; I'd welcome your help.
.





Colin,
ReplyDeleteHow about reviewing Night Force #3? It's a follow-up to the 1980s Marv Wolfman/Gene Colan series of the same name. Marv's working with Tom Mandrake this time (evocative of Colan, I think, while still being his own man). I think it's an interesting attempt at a horror comic from the big two. What say you?
Rob M
Hello Rob M:- I have to tell you, at the moment, Night Force #3 is WAY ahead of all other competitors :)
DeleteBless you, Rob. You've made sure that whatever else happens, there will be a nomination. It's always a cheek asking folks to contribute - I'm very nervous about doing so - and I'm grateful to you for the suggestion. I think it'd be a really interesting challenge to write about NF#3.
Well, from DC you've got Deathstroke #9 by Rob Liefeld, Rob Liefeld, and Rob Anti-Liefeld Equation, that should be a good time. Or if you prefer good comics, the Mystery in Space oner.
ReplyDeleteThere's John Byrne's Trio #1 from IDW, which could be a boring, staid adventure comic or a maddening vortex into a lost mind.
Hello Bill:- Three comics I doubt I would have considered, which is exactly what I need. My thanks to you. The very idea of that "maddening vortex into a lost mind" you evoke makes a JB comic sound more interesting than it has since .... oh, his first West Coast Avengers issue some time before the world was round.
DeletePart of me is wishing it'd been THIS week - I'd love to hear your thoughts on Bulletproof Coffin #4, Action Comics #9 and Fury Max #1.
ReplyDeleteBut to play the game according to the rules set down - there's a Doctor Who Classics out from IDW involving earlyish Morrison and Colin Baker converging, so I'll throw that into the nominations pile.
Hello Al:- You know, I'd love to read a review of those 3 books you mention myself. I've stumbled across none of them so far this month, but they feel like the kind of haul memory would associated with a really good period in weekly shop-raids. I wish I'd done this a week earlier.
DeleteA Morrison Dr Who/Colin Baker comic? It sounds like a memory from a dream, like an alt-world where Scotland won the World Cup or that third season of I Cladius got made.
Well, I get those dreams ...
Might I suggest Avenging Spider-Man #7? A done-in-one issue while the book is between creative teams. I'd quite like to read what you make of Kathryn Immonen.
ReplyDeleteHello Skippy:- I've not been back to Avenging Spider-Man since an underwhelming first issue. Of course, that makes the idea of going back all the more interesting. I wish I had time to write about all these books, there's not a comic I can't be fascinated by, and I love to discover why you find Kathryn Immonen's work interesting :)
DeleteIn my entirely anecdotal circles, I've found that people seem to think that Immonen's work lacks...coherence. Her Hellcat miniseries is probably the best example of this. Events and the reasons behind them are explained, just not always with great clarity. It's very easy to get the impression of jumping from one random escapade to the next.
DeleteHer comics are excellent fun, though.
Hello Skippy:- Well, that just makes it all the more fascinating. A thesis - an author's work lack coherence - challenged by evidence which suggests the matter's been over-simplified - you think they're excellent fun - strikes me as something which ought to be investigated :)
DeleteGah. I so wish you'd asked this last week. The new Dial H for HERO #1 just got released today and it's the best twenty two pages of comic book weird-o-wonder-fun I've read all year. Seriously. Funny with an understated current of horror. There's a couple of what I thought were wrong turns but in hindsight they might be accomplishing something rather smart. Aaanyway, that one's a good'un at least.
ReplyDeleteRuan
Hello Ruan:- It does indeed seem as if the consensus is that I'm starting this a week too late. (I do have Dial H For HERO on the way, however.)Truth is, I've been thinking about doing this kind of post for a long while, but, for the reasons I mentioned above, I've been hesitant to give it a go. Waking up to the responses folks have been so generous to suggest - hats off to your good self among them! - has been a real privilege. And you've certainly sharpened my desire to read DHFH. I look forward to it arriving.
DeletePity it isn't this week as I'm wetting myself in excitement over Dial H #1, so much so I am not tradewaiting it!!
ReplyDeleteOK looking down the list:
Dan the Unharmable #1
Lady Death #17
Mystery In Space #1
Scooby-Doo Where Are You? #21
Suicide Squad #9
Dejah Thoris And The White Apes of Mars #2
Frankenstein Alive Alive #1
Trio #1
America's Got Powers #1
Manhattan Projects #2
Marvel Zombies Destroy #1
Takio #1
Jurassic Strike Force 5 #4
Assembled The Avengers Cologne Set - hmmm I might have run out of comics.
Just a random mix, some that I am intrigued about, some that are truly random, some to get you riled up and some just to freak things up a bit. I tended not to throw you into a series hundreds of issues in, as a) you'd just be faced with the problem of not knowing what is going on (although in hindsight I suppose they should still be accessible, if not then that is a problem, so I'll add in Tick #100) and b) OK there was a b) but I can't remember what it was, but it was very good, probably. There is also 2000AD and the Megazine, but that is too easy. ;)
Anyway, there are more than you'll need so feel free to whittle them down, pick a couple or quietly delete this comment whislt rolling your eyes.
Hello Emperor:- Dial H For Hero does seem to be one of those books which folks are really looking out for. And I'm really pleased about the fact that DC are stretching the envelope there. There's no publisher's output that I want to feel largely unenthusiastic about - until we get to the loopy offensive ones - so lets hope things are developing for the House Of .... oh .... Before Watchman.
DeleteYour list has immediately created a ranking of titles, with Mystery In Space and Trio moving to the top! How fantastic! I'd never dream of striding out in that direction. I don't mean that I think the titles are or aren't worthy of folks attention: it's just not a pairing I'd ever think "Must put them together in a review". But then Dejah Thoris? Jurassic Strike Force? Scooby-Doo? They all sound like new challenges - if you'll forgive the old-teacher'-speak - and regardless of how tongue-in-cheek or not the suggestions, I find it all really interesting.
Tick #100 shall be added too. I retain my fascination in how long-running books survive and - to my no doubt eternal shame - I've never read a full-length Tick story before. I know, I know, it's unforgivable.
2000AD is easy, you're right, but isn't it great it's doing so well. I really am working my way up to a Zaucer Of Zilk piece, but it seems so splendid that I can't but feel the best thing to do would be just to tell folks they MUST go read it and leave it there.
Thanks Emperor. I appreciate you helping out.
Well I'm not sure how tongue-in-cheek they were, in that they'd all be things I'd be interested to hear your opinions in, even if some were intended to... provoke perhaps, but to definitely push you out of your comfort zone ito reading comics you might skip. So, for example, with Dejah Thoris - I was a big fan of the John Carter books as a youngster and read a few of the original Marvel Comics for this, but have tended to avoid more recent versions as it is possible to drop the ball badly there (I've seen the mockbuster Princess of Mars by The Asylum, so I speak from experience), so your opinion would be of interest.
DeleteAmerica's Got Powers has really split the readers and I am curious how far Ross has come since the rather faltering start that was Turf. I see from your comments below that you've already read it though and it seems to get your thumbs up. I'm sure I'll catch it in CLiNT if I can keep forcing myself to buy it.
Oh yes and the Tick - I am in the same position as you - I have seen some of the TV series and... was there a film?, but haven't read a single comic of it despite the possibility I'd like it (like Savage Dragon too I suppose) and issue #100 seems too good an opportunity to miss.
I am pleased to see that the suggestions that appear to be leading the field are all in my list (Trio, Mystery in Space and Scooby Doo) but if you are serious about pushing the envelope you might want to throw in a fourth title that is the one from the suggestions you'd least like to read, perhaps based on how much your sphincter tightens when you read the title (or how loud you groan if you are into public displays of disapproval ;) ). You might just surprise yourself, or end up hating us...
I look forward to your Zaucer Of Zilk post, although I can't imagine the pressure of having Al Ewing around helps with that ;)
Hello Emperor:- You're right, tongue-in-cheek is the wrong term. I guess I was reaching for a term which indicated a willingness not to be over serious, to sidestep the worthy critics irony, and to just own up to be interested in a variety of books. Tongue-in-cheek wasn't the term for that, was it?
DeleteI was a huge John Carter fan as a boy. It was the only SF book my Dad ever owned up to liking as a young lad, so I found the books and read and re-read them. So I'm curious too, though I'm nervous about some of the cheesecakery I've seen on covers etc
America's Got Powers isn't something that my soul went out to, but I admired the HECK out it. It really is well-crafted, though if I were you, I wouldn't catch in pieces at Clint. I think it probably needs to be read in the original form. I was very disappointed with Turf, but as I say, credit to Mr Ross. He's worked on his craft, and those folks who've ascribed the book's worth to BH are just being petty. Credit where it's due.
I think it's wonderful that it's Trio, MIS and Scooby Doo, although I was rather interested in the Morrison Dr Who and ... well, just about everything. Isn't it odd that nobody has gone for the Big Two in any number?
I do like the least enticing prospect you suggest. At the moment, that would have included two of the front-runners :) Not because I hate the thought, but just because of how they're at the edge of my radar,
I find Zaucer of Zilk's a subtly disturbing strip actually, as well as being damned good fun. Trying to explain why it shoudl have that effect is a worrying enough business in itself.
I'm getting lots of visits from the American Reaper link you put up at 2000AD a few weeks ago. It seems I've annoyed some folks there too. I tell you, Emperor, there's no easy way to be hated than to suggest sexism in a comic book. Yet, I shall survive, I shall survive, as long as I know how to love, I know I'll be alive ....
La-la-la ... you see, I'm not listening ... la,lah, la...
"I do like the least enticing prospect you suggest. At the moment, that would have included two of the front-runners :)"
DeleteAh ha!! Well job done there :D
"America's Got Powers isn't something that my soul went out to, but I admired the HECK out it. It really is well-crafted, though if I were you, I wouldn't catch in pieces at Clint. I think it probably needs to be read in the original form."
I'm afraid that won't be happening - if you told me it was like God's own semen I'd still tradewait it and I don't see you going anyway near that, so it is CLiNT or nowt. And if Millar's next batch of comics aren't an improvement on the last lot it might not even be that (unless he can come up with some excellent comics to team them with), as that end of CLiNT 1.0 clearing of the decks gave me too much of a Millar overdose and it wasn't pretty.
"I'm getting lots of visits from the American Reaper link you put up at 2000AD a few weeks ago. It seems I've annoyed some folks there too. I tell you, Emperor, there's no easy way to be hated than to suggest sexism in a comic book."
Although you did highlight a whole slew of problems on a number of different levels. What is interesting is people picking up on the sexism angle.
Hello Emperor:- "I'm afraid that won't be happening" - I admire a man who's not afraid to make his point clear! Yes, I understand your p.o.v. As for CLiNT, for obvious reasons I've just taken out a sub during a very reasonable 1-day-only offer. But I will go with you that I was Millered out myself. For me, even beyond more specific concerns, the storytelling is often so obvious that the whole process drags. It gets to the point at which I feel I'm just looking at pages designed to suggest a film rather than creating a compelling experience on the page. Projects like Superior just take so long to be done, produce little if anything that's fresh, and contain so relatively little content. Still, at least Secret Service, for all its by-the-numbers script did contain (1) Dave Gibbons art and (2) massive political incorrectness. Does he do this on purpose?
DeleteBless you, you're right; the American Reaper article was concerned with more than misogyny. Still, I found the, er, contending comments very interesting. And I'm not being arch there. It's always good for the ego to be reminded that there's not just different opinions on a strip like AR, but radically different ones. I really must go back to the AR chapters and see how the praise which was given to it could have been generated. I just couldn't see it, and whether I agree or not, I ought to at least be able to register the appeal.
"As for CLiNT, for obvious reasons I've just taken out a sub during a very reasonable 1-day-only offer."
DeleteWell the good thing about CLiNT is it is a lot of comics for your quid and if you can get a cheap subscription it'd almost be silly not to.
"I feel I'm just looking at pages designed to suggest a film rather than creating a compelling experience on the page."
It's a spot on description, as that is what they are these days - enough plot and action to give a screenwriter a framework they can build a proper script around. It is telling that Wanted took the comic and radically altered it and that Kick Ass the screenplay was being written in parallel with the comic (with stories going back and forth), even getting ahead of the comics script at least once. It is a hyperactive child's description of a film ("and then... and then...") rather than the film itself.
"Projects like Superior just take so long to be done, produce little if anything that's fresh, and contain so relatively little content."
The most interesting thing there was the degree of self-fulfilment, you felt you were reading an essay by Mark Millar aged 10 about what he'd do if he were Superman, because I can't explain it any other way - the scenes where he fixes all the problems at superspeed just wouldn't work, you'd pulp people you were grabbing.
"Does he do this on purpose?"
Yes. It is all on purpose, which makes the womb booby trap in Nemesis on the rape in KA2 seem even more nasty and cynical.
"I really must go back to the AR chapters and see how the praise which was given to it could have been generated."
I'm sorry I can't help you there as your review crystallised all my concerns far more effectively than I could have done, partly because of your razor sharp analytical skills, but also because of the bone-deep... weariness it instilled (I just wanted to put it down and forget about it, not detailing all the ways it fell short of the excellence both creators are capable of). In fact, I do wonder if the same criticism applies to AR as it does to Millar's work - we are being given the rough outline of a film in comic form, rather than a fully formed comic.
I wonder if it'd be worth looking at other comics made as an admitted pitch to Hollywood and seeing if they have similar failings. Then again some of those are based on failed screenplays, so someone has probably already put the work in. I read The Nye Incident, a GN by Whitey Streiber based on a failed screenplay, and it was interesting to see a couple of examples were the art utterly failed to transmit the story (in one case I realised the point would have worked in colour but the comic was in B&W) and really what I was really looking at was a collection of storyboards.
Ah well.... Dial H #1 awaits me :)
Hello Emperor:- Mark Millar has obviously developed a method which is very enticing to a large slice of the super-book market and to movie-makers too. I wouldn't criticise that on objective grounds, because that would be daft. But I do feel that he often lets the virtues of the medium and sub-genre lie fallow, producing under-powered stories which really are almost discussions of how certain superhero archetypes work rather than stories in themselves. Obviously some of these attempts are better than others; I thought and still think that Kick Ass I was a fine book. Kick Ass II I don't nearly as well about. As you say, it's very much like we're reading not stories, but ideas of how stories work. It can feel somewhat like baby food, pre-digested and generally tasteless. (I don't mean that last word in a funny-ha-ha not-funny way.)
DeleteI have returned to American Reaper, and even given that I believe in the fact that all responses to comics are essentially subjective, it's rubbish. It's pitiful, it really is, and if there really are folks who can't recognise the objectivisation - and all the disturbing ideas it brings with it - in the half-naked daughter scene, then ... well, I'm baffled, to be honest. If that's not sexism, then there quite literally isn't any such thing. Pat Mills and Mark Millar producing work with a huge degree of structural and ideological problems in common? That really is a disturbing thought, Mr E,
I've never read the The Nye Incident, though I believe I may have seen it - may - in my local library. I shall keep an eye on it.
I've had Dial H For Hero waiting for me all day, and never found the time to read it. That's certainly not on. Tomorrow I shall be enjoying its virtues ...
If you haven't heard about it before, Courtney Crumrin is quite an excellent book, about the adventures of a young girl going to live with her uncle who is an old practicionner of dark magic.
ReplyDeleteIt could be a nice change of pace from the super hero books, reading a well constructed comic book for once. :)
I for one would be delighted of hearing what you have to say about it.
Hello Bobo:- I've heard little of Courtney Crumrin, but your summary sounds immediately interesting. It sparked off a flashbulb memory of a much-missed and long gone series Leave It To Chance. By that, I don't mean to suggest similarities, because I couldn't know, but I did mean to say "I will be checking that out anyway".
DeleteThe super-books are only a fraction of what I read, but I did choose to focus on them when I started the blog: it set me the challenge of trying to find ways of dealing with a relatively narrow sub-genre. My love for the cape'n'chest-insignia brigade hasn't diminished, but neither has my love for just about EVERYTHING else, so I do find myself writing more and more - here & elsewhere - about other genres. It's one thing to say "I said I do this for a set period of time to force myself to cope with certain challenges" and another to be constantly NOT discussing all that good stuff out there.
Thank you for the suggestion. It's much appreciated.
Oh yeah, Courtney Crumrin's a brilliant all-ages fantasy/comedy, with a very sharp edge underneath it all (and just started a new ongoing last month). Courtney herself is a grumpy pre-teen misanthrope with softer bits and more dependency on her warlock uncle than she realises, and a fluid, still-forming set of ethics and understanding. (There's a bit in an older story where she's cynical and dismissive of a man's crucifix protecting him against dark magic, and her uncle gently points out that if their power works, why can't the man's?)
Delete- Charles RB
Hello Charles:- thank you for backing up Bobo's already compelling recommendation. Courtney Crumrin really does sound like a comic worth reading.
DeleteSo, whether for this particular poll or not, I do exactly that.
I'd like to see any given New 52 #1 comic (preferably one meant to be youth-friendly) VS DC's Scooby Doo Where Are You #21, simply to see how the New 52's "we're after new readers" approach matches up against a licensed comic that's under greater restrictions. Who wins, and what can they learn from the other?
ReplyDeleteI'll second Al on the reprint of Morrison's "Doctor Who: The World Shapers"!
(2000 AD's contribution to Free Comic Day might be worth a look too, how does it work? (Hopefully well, with Zombo and Ichabod representing new strips...))
- Charles RB
Hello Charles:- THAT'S TWO VOTES FOR SCOOBY-DOO!!!!! Well, how splendid would that be. I don't have the chops for that, which is a really good reason to not mind at all if that comes out in the final 3. (And there will be a final 3, which I wondered about, and not because I don't think folks who occasionally pop in here aren't good eggs, but because I did fear the request for help was bordering on the cheeky. I so didn't want to give the impression that I was doing anyone a favour by writing about a comic they like, because that's an arrogance I don't carry. I'm really grateful that folks know I didn't mean that.) And the frame for a piece - ie: against a "youth" DC comic - is a fascinating one. I've been thinking about that whole idea of what is and what isn't a "youth" comic recently in some detail. For example, the Dan Dare piece from last Friday - which I'll finish off soon - was all about a comic which could today be seen as "boy's-own" and "archaic", but that origin story has some bleak ideas in it and challenges the readers in ways which comics aimed today at older audiences certainly don't. Your point, as I understand it, is a good one.
DeleteAh, and the World Shapers too :)
Thank you Charles. It's very kind of you.
How about Peter Panzerfaust #4 from Image Comics? It's not a comic I've heard much talk about online but it's one which I've quite enjoyed all the same and it has a nice central concept too.
ReplyDeleteFrankenstein: Agent of SHADE #9 from DC Comics: this is a series I'm still reading but have been in two minds about. Some issues I really enjoy, others not so much. It's kind of like they can't decide whether to go full-on superhero mode or be more like BPRD. Would be interested to hear your thoughts. Perhaps it might be fairer to wait until #10 when a new creative team starts...
Uncanny X-Force #25 from Marvel Comics: Purely because it's one of those anniversary issues that are supposed to be effective 'jumping on' points for readers and is the start of a story arc as opposed to being in the middle of one, like my two previous suggestions! It's a "double-sized" issue though so it's on the pricier side.
Hello oh-em-eff=gee:- Peter Panzerfaust is an interesting call. I read the first issue in its second print, thought it interesting but probably wait for the trade material. (In the lack of a recognisable end to the story, for example, it seemed as if it had been created for a different format.) But undoubtedly interesting & I've always intended to read on. If that comes up, I'll have no complaints.
DeleteYou know, I last read FAOS with the OMAC cross-over. And I'm relieved to hear that I'm not the only one in two minds. There are moments where the real off-road weirdness threatens to burst through and I think "Here we go!!!!". Then it seems to haul back into standard-issue fare. I like to see how it's developing.
I've had some issues with Uncanny X-Force, though I fully recognise that it's a much-loved book. It would be a really good chance to challenge my preconceptions. I have problems, for example, with the use of the Cap Britain backstory, but I can't deny that I really ought to work out where I stand with UXF.
Great ideas, and as with the above, the chance just to ask myself why I haven't reviewed these books is a good opportunity to think about doing things differently. Thank you.
Hmm . . .I'd love to know your thoughts on Earth-2 #1, actually.
ReplyDeleteAnd it's not on either of these, but if you're taking requests at all, I was wondering--have you read the Prophet and Glory relaunches at Image? They're really rather interesting in how they take rather pedestrian Liefeld comics and give them a wholly unique voice.
(if you've already done them and I missed it, well, disregard this notice)
Hello Kazekage:- Earth-2 is one of the small bundle of comics coming this week actually. I've heard very good things about it. @profmdwhite and Martin at http://dangermart.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/earth-2-1-review.html both speak highly of it. I looking forward to reading it.
DeleteI've not read the Glory reboot yet, but I have read the first two Prophets. They don't quite hit the sweet spot yet, but that doesn't mean that I haven't enjoyed them and admired the intelligence and innovation on show. On my never-ending list of things to do, wondering why Prophet hasn't quite touched me as much as impressed me ranks highly.
I'll check out Glory. The original hasn't left me motivated for more, but your view of them does make the business of comparing what was with what is interesting. Thank you.
Howzabout Dejah Thoris and the White Apes of Mars #2?
ReplyDeleteI read a select handful of Dynamite's comics every month. Lots of great art and some of it is some awesome pulp adventure comics!
The end of the first issue of Dejah Thoris and the White Apes of Mars kind of gave me the willies. Cliffhangers don't come much more cliffhangery than that!
Hello Hoosier X:- There we go, two votes for Dejah Thoris! Fantastic! Just not where I'd think of going, and so, a good place to be nudged towards.
DeleteI'm a great lover of simple technical riffs such as page-turners and cliff-hangers. I just enjoy seeing how each team approaches those matters. You've made me curious about DTAYWAOM #1's end. Thank you.
Pretty scattershot selection so far...
ReplyDeletePlease please please* review Dicks #4 by Garth Ennis and John McCrea. I just dug the early issues out from deep in my too-read pile last week and was whisked back to my early 90s time in Belfast, and the mordant wit of the 'beleaguered' people there.
Plus another vote for the Grant Morrison Dr Who Comic. I've read his other two Who stories, and only this lunctime was thinking about buying the $40 trades to get this story. Glad to see I won't have to spend the kids' shoe-money after all. I'll be adding it to my epic and neverending Morrison readthrough on the Captain Comics board in any case.
Finally, I'll go for the Buffy season 9 issue. I was a huge fan of the TV series, but by the time season 8 ended I'd decided that the comics series was missing something. On the same comicshop visit as above, I was mulling over how they managed to lose a dedicated fan like myself.
There. No dumb Big Two comics for you 'cause I'm feeling benevolent today.
*Yes, I know it's a straight up vote, but I'd love to see what you make of this deeply 'idiosyncratic' comics series.
Hello Figserello:- Scattershot is good! Scattershot means that I'll inevitably be pushed out of my comfort zone.
DeleteI've no knowledge of that Ennis/McCrea title at all, a blind-spot that in itself is regrettable, and "mordant wit" from GE can, when he's his "empathy" hat on, play out beguilingly. I will chase it down anyway, pocket-money & opportunity allowing :)
Dr Who is now the front-runner, which I never would have dreamed! I have no idea how to review that and make it work in any way at all. Good. Bafflement is good.
Buffy I have read the past few issues of, and reviewed them in "Q" this month. It's just a review of a few lines length, because that's what the comics column demands, so it'd be good to have a few more words to play with.
Thank you, Figsrello. Your Vision icon is always a welcome sign here.
Ennis and McCrea definitely do NOT have their empathy hat on with Dicks. It's a very gross-out comedy. (The clue is in the title.)
DeleteI've only skimmed your Ennis Dan Dare posts, as I have most of the comics downstairs and I'll get around to reading them at some stage, but there is nothing of the reserve, maturity and decency that you extoll in Ennis' Dan Dare. Extremely tasteless might be one way to put it! (Caveat Emptor, Colin!) But after reading one particularly well executed set piece, I found myself laughing in the dark when I turned out the light.
Dicks does try to get across something of everyday life in working class Belfast (and even rural Ulster), grossly exagerated as the physical humour is. There is some honesty in the portrayal of the characters lives. It's obviously a labour of love for the creators, as they try to find a way of producing a comic where their own background and regional speech idioms are central. They don't make any concessions to an international audience. The slang and speech patterns are very authentic. Actually, I was a little surprised to see that the comic is still coming out - it's always been irregular - and surprised to see it on a shelf here in Australia. Someone from the rest of the UK would get most of it, but I can't imagine what anyone from further afield would make of it.
I've been a big fan of Ennis along the way, but haven't been following his work for a long time now.
Hello Figserello:- thank you for preventing me from stumbling own in my own niave way. I shall be warned and keep my defences up when I come across the undoubtedly innocently-titled Dicks.
DeleteObviously, since I haven't read the book, I can't offer anything to your analysis. But you've certainly made it all sound interesting :) Thank you.
Colin, I would love to hear your thoughts on Saga. I tried the first issue and was surprised to find myself left cold despite the return of BKV to comics.
ReplyDeleteHello Emmet:- Hurrah for you! I read the second issue of Saga, having failed to get hold of the first, and I found myself similarly cold. I couldn't see WHAT the fuss was about. It was a perfectly predictable, perfectly unremarkable, perfectly undemanding comic book. I've no problems with it existing, I'm glad for everyone making it and enjoying it. But a big deal? Well, I've been wrong before - A FEW THOUSAND TIMES THIS WEEK!!!! - but it looks to me like a dwindling blogosphere reaching out for anything half-decent and half-collectible.
DeletePerhaps the 1st issue will win me round. As it is, cold, cold, colder ....
Just to add from Facebook; Mr Mike Phillips of the parish council of the county of Sequart suggests taking a look at X-O Manowar, a title which I remember with a strange fondness from the far, far distant past ... Haven't read it since, mind you.
ReplyDeleteYep, I'm on Facebook. Haven't got the faintest what to do with it yet. There'll be something groovy I can do for TooBusyThinking on it one day, and one day I'll think of it. http://www.facebook.com/colin.smith.1048
I read X-O Manowar - it felt oddly like a comic throwback to the days of Victory and Hotspur.
Delete....anyone else ever read them?
Hello Emmet:- Seriously? I say that not to doubt you, but to wonder why anyone would want to be reproducing comics which were old in the day. For all that I'm sure they had considerable virtues, those were comics which were failing badly in the Seventies. I'm very curious. Are you going to review the book?
DeleteI think I will. A few other books that came out this week caught my eye so I'll probably do a selection of reviews for The Momus Report.
DeleteHello Emmet:- I'll certainly be over to read that. Suddenly realised that I must add The Momus Report to my blog feed. Until then, folks may care to visit your new place at http://themomusreport.blogspot.co.uk/
DeleteHope it's not too late; actually I can't make many suggestions as I don't read any ongoing series, but I would also like to vote for Trio, as I'm really curious about this and would enjoy your thoughts on it (haven't read JB's Cold War, either, but I rather enjoyed his recent forays into classic Star Trek published by IDW).
ReplyDeleteMystery in Space also sounds cool, and since it's a one-shot there's a better chance of me actually buying it...
Hello Edo:- You're not late at all, though I'm grateful you expressed that concern, because it's led to me going back and making things clearer in the above. Thanks.
DeleteI read a collection of the Byrne Star Treks a few months ago. They were some of the better comics version of the show I've seen, though not on the level of the Barr/Sutton tales from the mid-Eighties, which I remain fond of. If Trio remains in the top 3, I have every faith that it'll a book worth writing about, regardless of my own opinion. I've ... say I say unresolved Byrne issues. Cold War is another title which I know nothing about; I may well go and see if there's an affordable #1 on E-Bay.
Mystery In Space is an enticing prospect, isn't it? Allred, Pope; it's not a tough sell :)
Thanks for your suggestions. It's much appreciated.
Reader Roulette, eh? Plenty of books coming out, but from a quick prusal of the lists and some of the comments made here, I'd suggest:
ReplyDeleteUncanny X-Force - Deadpool says "me love you long time" in a cathouse full of Asian sex workers. I think I might want to hear a more considered opinion about this book than the one I may have formed already.
Scooby Doo Where Are You? Never really liked Scooby Doo until recently when he went all deconstructionist on his own mythology in stuff like Mystery Inc and the cheap (and admittedly terrible) tv movies that I enjoyed despite myself, so I'm interested in hearing how this comic has turned out, though licenced books from DC tend to turn out rather well.
Pokemon Black and White. Less intelligent folk just don't seem to comprehend that it's preserving the artistic integrity to have the text going in the opposite direction of the artwork, but these people - which apparently include Scott McCloud - don't understand a story about a girl catching magic monsters in tennis-ball sized Tardises to later fight them against each other for sport, all the while being pursued by a talking cat. These people don't know high art like Pokemon, Colin.
Trio - recent print Trek outings have proved to me that if he can tear himself away from his day job as an internet curmudgeon, JB still has some good comics in him, though he has a history of not sticking with self-created superhero properties long enough to form an impression, so I am on the fence about this one and shall be pooling opinions before taking the plunge myself.
Hello Brigonos:- Now, Reader Roulette would've made an excellent title for this :)
DeleteI have never gained a taste for Deadpool; I'm neither a fan or apathetic, I've just never really managed to warm to him. Having said that, the screen-time he's been given in UXM has been the best thing about the title for me. Similarly Scooby Doo; I had no interest as a kid, I've no interest now. Which makes me, again, really interested to see how how I can make sense of a book that I'm so uncomfortable with.
Pokemon Black and White. Mr B, I have no idea .... I have no idea at all about Pokemon. I know of no-one with broader taste than your good self. Mind you, talking cats are always a winner. With the exception of that smug smugger on the Sabrina show. Which of course I have never seen. Except for occasional moments with the smug cat in. Who I hate for his smugness.
Trio has now pulled out ahead in Reader Roulette. Trio? Well, I wanted pushing. I say "good call", because I nothing about it at all.
Allred & Pope on Mystery in Space = a comic worth reading & writing about. I might actually (gasp) buy the comic reviews unseen.
ReplyDeleteAmerica's Got Powers interests me as well. Can anything new be brought to the "realistic" super-hero genre?
- Mike Loughlin
Hello Mike:- And Mystery In Space seems to pulling ahead with Trio! I share your suspicion that buying it unseen would not be the wildest of gambles.
DeleteAmerica's Got Powers is actually a beast of a series. I was a right grump about Turf, but AGP is a comic that can take on all-comers in the teens-in-costumes super-book. It's a book built for success, and I don't say that cynically. I mean "It does what it says on the tin", and it does it very well. Ross's script is very well crafted and Hitch's art is as wonderfully widescreen and human as anyone could have hoped for. To be honest, it shames the great mass of the Big Two's product, and shows how the alternative route can really pay off even in the super-book. It'll be a huge movie in no time, I suspect, and good for its creators. They've earned it. I'm not going to be cynical about craft like that.
I've just received Dial H, but haven't yet read it. I am intrigued not by its place in the New 52, or by any legacy it has, save that its legacy was what drew the author to pitch the series, and do so with an earnestness that sold me the comic. I look forward to reading it tonight, and (hopefully) to what you might have to say about it yourself.
ReplyDeleteSave that, I'd love to read your take on the latest Archie comic! Just for the juxtaposition, and the fact that Archie from a your perspective would probably be similar to me trying to write about Beano or some equivalent...
Hello Brian:- Yep the buzz about Dial H really is a-buzzing, isn't it? My copy arrives, if all goes well, on Saturday. I do find it odd that, as you say, the property's legacy should attract CM, given that the whole continuity has changed. But it does give him an incredible amount of freedom, I guess. I'm glad to be looking forward like this to a new DC book.
DeleteI'll happily add Archie to the list. I discussed Life With Archie # 16 in my last Q column - which makes me sound very full of myself; all I meant was, in that column, I discussed Life with Archie. The brief for the column is to mention recent and future material which a general audience might find interesting, and I thought that was a really interesting, and quietly radical, comic. I've even read some Kiss & Archie titles recently.
But you are right, Archie does express a different culture. In fact, I picked up the 40s and 50s collections not so long ago. I was disappointed that they weren't more weird, more distinctly American from the period. I wanted to be excluded and baffled!
Sorry I hadn't acquainted myself with your Archie review. I'll have to seek that out.
DeleteI have a sense, from the requests I'm reading, that there's equal parts of 1)interest in your thoughts on disparate comics, and 2)TBTAMC's version of Stump the Band, by having you read the potentially most difficult of comics to review. Or maybe its just that it's easier to find the latest disappointment in Marvel and DC's current offerings, so works less likely to be reviewed make the list...
Either way, looking forward to reading the results of this exercise, whatever the subject matter may be!
Hello Brian:- I should be shot if I was recommending you look at that Q. My apologies for even seeming to do so. I merely meant that I agree with you that Archie comics are most certainly worth paying attention to :)
DeleteI like the idea that folks have been responding to my request to help me push the envelope by making sure that the envelope gets pushed. I must admit, I've wondered how some of the nominated books could be discussed in a few hundred words. Stumped as I am, I guess that's the challenge.
But I also suspect that the lack of Big Two material points to a lack of excitement about the mainstream product for next week at least. Looks like DC might have scored a good number of nominations this week - Earth-2, Action, DHFH - but next week's schedule looks less enticing.
My best to you, Mr B :)
hi colin--
ReplyDeletei don't know why my comments here disappear so easily. anyway, i would also be interested in your take on the new Life With Archie/Archie: The Married Life comics. i'm planning on writing about them in june and so will forebear on sharing my thoughts lest they contaminate yours.
iZombie is a fun collaboration between Chris Roberson and Mike Allred. it has some of the snap of Allred's 90s Mad Man comics, without some of the directionlessness of his more recent ones.
Fatale is not my favorite Ed Brubaker/Sean Phillips comics, but it is an extremely interesting one. it's an interesting mix of hardboiled fiction and lovecraftian horror.
if you were doing graphic novels, i'd be interested in your thoughts on roger langridge's Snarked. though people in comics circles rarely talk about children's comics beyond declaring sadly that children don't read comics, i think some of the best and most interesting comics in the last 10 years are children's/all-ages.
i also am of 2 minds about Frankenstein: Agent of S.H.A.D.E. i skipped the OMAC crossover but came back for the Dr. Manhattan as giant red capt./mr. kurz issue. i'm hoping that by the second or third arc, it will be great. as it is, Demon Knights looks like it will be the only ongoing DC comic i will be buying regularly.
Hello Carol:- I'm sorry that there's been a problem leaving comics, but I am grateful that you persevered. Thank you.
DeleteBy chance, Brian just asked me about Archie. I was, as I said to Mr W, really pleased to get the chance to discuss Life With Archie in Q this month. It's a comic which the general reader won't have heard about, and the one I mentioned was #16, because the politics of that is obviously of interest. I was really impressed with the LWA I read. It's not my kind of comic in that I tend to prefer more bite, but bite isn't something that Archie should be doing, and the politics was still daring enough!
iZombie isn't a book I know well. I love Mike Allred's work, though I know little of Mr Robertson beyond his recent stand re; DC's policy on ripping off creators. I've been determined to check out his work ever since. Fatale is again a book that I know little of, though I read the first two volumes of Incognito last week and enjoyed them very much.
I hadn't realised that Snarked had been collected. Right, that goes on the list. Mr Langridge was involved in one of my favourite Dr Who stories ever, so even if he'd never done everything else that he has, I'd be keen to check out his work. I read #4 of Snarked, but I suspect I need to experience it in context too.
I'm glad to hear that Frankenstein has pepped up. I do trust your judgment, and have for a long while, so I'll keep an eye out for that. I'm with you on Demon Knights, and I'm hoping that the likes of Dial H For Hero and even the well-received Earth-2 might give me more to buy at DC. I don't want to grumping about the company, any more than I want to be disappointed at Marvel. But boy each company is at risk of beling left behind at the moment ....
hi again--
Deletelangridge is one of my favorite creators. i love Thor: Mighty Avenger, and was sad to see it cancelled. i've been weighing picking up his John Carter adaptation for Marvel, but my comic shop's copy is a little beat-up.
i am hoping that Frankenstein picks up or just evens out. theoretically, i should love it, but there's been something about the integration of a vertigo style and sensibility into DC mainstream that doesn't seem to be working so well. hopefully, everyone will
get more assured in finding a new balance.
Hello Carol:- Thor The Mighty Avenger was a fine book, with the Cpt Britain/bar-fighting issue being a particular favourite. Whoever decided to cancel the book rather than fighting to expand the market with it ... is either lacking in imagination or led by the almighty dollar to the degree that profit has to arrive tomorrow. And by that, I'm not digging at the creators or editors who did their best to keep the book alive.
DeleteBut I didn't know that the Marvel John Carter adaption was by RL. Well, that's me out to buy it NOW!
I too would love to see Frankenstein pull it round. For me, and to reduce complex chin-stroking to simpleprinciples, the book's too full of punching and spectacular moments. Frankenstein has the chance to be as fascinating as, for example, The Goon and Hellboy, books which actually spend remarkably little time on the fisti-cuffs. It's the characters and the bright ideas I want to buy into, and I don't think Frankenstein pays nearly enough attention to such things.
No one here has mentioned Alabaster: Wolves #2, out from Dark Horse. In some ways it's exactly the sort of comic you've been wishing for for a long time - a spin off from a hugely popular series of young-adult novels, with five relatively stand-alone issues. And really good.
ReplyDeleteHello Paul Newman's eyes:- and typing that alone on this miserable wet morning has cheered me up. You're absolutely right to imply that Alabaster: Wolves is exactly the sort of thing that I'd just not register as being for me, and I'm really glad you've added it to the list. To be honest, I want to go and read every single one of these recommended titles. If I had the time and the dosh, I certainly would. I'll be fascinated to see if there's a late surge for AW:2.
ReplyDeleteKeith Silva on Twitter - @keithpmsilva - said:
ReplyDelete"love to see what you would do w/ Bulletproof Coffin #4 that is the tough row to hoe for sure, Mystery in Space? Mind the Gap?"
Thank you! MIS is now out in front, and Bulletproof Coffin seems to demand attention, doesn't it? Mind the Gap I've never even heard of to my shame; I'm off to find out more at this very moment.
Hello Colin. If you're still taking requests, and given some of the things you gave me to think about with the recent Dan Dare posts, and since someone brought up Scooby Doo anyway, I wonder how far out of your way you'd have to go to hunt down the IDW Transformers tie-in "Last Stand of the Wreckers". It's made by people with a clear love of the franchise and a bigger love of story telling. Hopefully that would come through even if Transformers isn't your cup of tea, which is why I'd recommend it. It's by fans for fans but I get the feeling those fans want to make the unconverted into fans. Or at least fans of a story that sums itself up as "for the redshirts".
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to what you've got in store. You haven't disappointed yet!
-Simon
Hello Simon:- the threads very much open until next Wednesday, so I'm very grateful for suggestions. I'm the wrong generation to have a fondness for the Transformers, but that doesn't mean that I'm in any way someone who feels snotty about the property. I know that Charles RB, who's another good egg who's commented here, is somebody who enjoys the Transformers at the moment, and I would like to "get" why people are so fond of the property. I've always loved it when creators who've got that "clear love of franchise and a bigger love of story telling" get their hands on a strip that's in some way touched them. My mind goes to Mantlo & Golden's first year of Micronauts stories, a comic which by rights ought to have struggled, but which was counter-intuitively brilliant.
DeleteSo, fair dues, I'll kept 'em peeled. Thank you for giving me something else to look forward to. And thank you for your kind words :)
I've been begging Colin to check out Wreckers - and they've got a brand new hardcover with even more stuff! - but getting an issue of Robert's TF: Robots In Disguise ongoing might work better for this column. I'm still waiting for #4 but the first three are very good at doing stories in one issue while clearly setting more up, and "ex-robot soldiers who are all nutcases and having SPACE ADVENTURES" is an easier hook for newbies. People have semi-jokingly called Wreckers "Transformers' Watchmen"; to fully get Watchmen, of course, you need to read a normal superhero comic first.
Delete- Charles RB
Hello Charles:- I did check out the Transformers issue you recommended last year, and found it interesting if hard to get a grip on. I was a little lost, but genuinely intrigued. And yes, I, Colin Smith, solemnly swear as an ex-Boy Scout to check out Wreckers :) I will too. Your recommendations are always winners, Charles, from Darkwing Duck onwards. I'd certainly have to be daft to ignore two such recommendations as yours and Simons.
DeleteThanks :)
I'd love to hear your take on Strip Magazine, the new(ish) British mag aimed at a younger audience. There's a good variety of strips, including a reprint of Action's controversial strip, Hookjaw. Maybe compare and contrast it with Clint, Mark Millar's attempt at launching a British title.
ReplyDeleteCan't wait to hear what you have to say about Zaucer of Zilk.
Hello Pops:- You remind me to track the first of the Strips so that I can work - as a pleasure and not a chore - through the issue I have. Thank you for that. I found myself really wishing that I knew where everything had started when I picked up #2 and 3, so you've nudged me to get yet another one of those things done which might otherwise, quite stupidly, take ages to be remembered. And, of course, CLiNT's being rebooted soon, making its redesign an interesting business.
ReplyDeleteI'm quite concerned about whatever it is I might to say about Zaucer Of Zilk :) There's nothing I ever wrote about that seems easy, but ZOZ is a deceptively simple beast & all too easy, I suspect, to over as well as under-write about. Gawd knows what the middle course between the obvious and the high-fallutin' is, but I'm glad that 2000AD has something that's as intriguingly different in it every week. Indeed, there's a chance I may see the new sub issue today. Huzzah!
I'm nearly caught up on Strip now which gives me a good overview of the stories and there is quite a mix from the rather flat and generic to those that seem guaranteed to be a hit with the kids (I won't name names, we can discuss that in a future column). What does impress me is that it none of it was dumbed down, which is always the danger with comics made by grown-ups (Hell, mainly middle aged guys) for kids - I remember what I started reading comics that were probably pitched at a slightly older audience that I liked the way no one was talking down to me. Which suggests to me it might be pitched just right to hit the gap where 2000AD used to be before it grew up with its readership.
DeleteOh and John Freeman says he has a few #1s of Strip left that he'll be selling at Bristol. I can always see if we can rummage you up a copy - it'd be worth it to see what you think of the mag.
Also a look at Phoenix comic that arose from the collapse of the DFC but that might be outside of your purview ;)
Hello Emperor:- If we can arrange a Paypal payment for Strip #1 so that there's no inconvenience to you, I'd be grateful. I would like to read it, and I do intend to support the mag by buying each issue. I know Strip doesn't need my patronising it, but I'm genuinely interested in where the comic goes. I'm also fascinated by your suspicion that it may be being pitched to an audience that's the next rung below in age but not smarts to 2000AD.
DeleteMy purview has exploded, Emperor. I'm reading everything I can, and mostly always have. The original purpose of TooBusyThinking - in that it was focused on a narrow range of comics in order to force me to learn to work under a form of pressure - is slipping away. I have been picking up Phoenix from my local Waitrose, for example! Oh, yes, I trying and failing to keep up with what's going on. But trying all the same :)
Happy FCBD! If you have that where you are, it would be nice if you could review The Hypernaturals; Dan Abnett and Andy Lanning's work doesn't get enough love.
ReplyDeleteHello AJM:- I've no been able to avail myself of FCBD, but I will certainly track down a copy of Hypernauts. And if anybody who's by chance scanning through here sees the title and wants to nominate for next week's piece, that's fine by me :) I know that Abnett and Lanning's work ought to have more attention. I've been writing positively about The New Deadwardians both here and elsewhere, but that's a solo piece, I know.
DeleteThanks.
I don't read comics regularly at all, or by issue, so I don't have any recommendations of that nature.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I'd like to add Empowered by Adam Warren to your gigantic list of books, probably in trade, to check out. It's a really interesting play on the superhero genre, a pretty unique play on the issues of gender and sexuality entrenched in the genre. Almost a bit Flex Mentallo-esque, if I'm permitted some pretension*, though with strong influences of manga and hip-hop/pop/fetish culture. Or something.
But yeah, it's this weird blend of sexy pinup crossed with really heartfelt emotional stuff. The basic concept is that the protagonist, Empowered, is a pretty flimsy superhero - her powersuit rips incredibly easily, and she loses almost all of her superpowers with the slightest tear, which allows her to be constantly tied up**.
The character has her roots as a sketch Warren drew at conventions, but developed an interesting personality and concept - that despite the near-certainty that she will bungle whatever job she tries to do, and end up tied up and humiliated, she continues to jump into every battle, which makes her even more heroic than her nigh-invulnerable team-mates. And her relationship with her boyfriend is so incredibly sweet - maybe the sweetest, most believable relationship in superhero comics right now.
Anyway, I think you'll enjoy it, and if you don't I'll be interested to find out why. It's got the mad energy of an indie comic, the anarchism and willingness to follow an idea to its logical, insane conclusion, that you don't see in a lot of stuff.
Cheers!
P.S. I totally missed FCBD. Damn, I think I went for the first time ever last year, and discovered a comic book in RI I haven't been to since. I did have to work today, but still. Damn.
* I haven't actually read Flex, only read about him online, and his segment in Doom Patrol.
** A lot of this can be read as meta-commentary, but the protagonist regularly breaks the fourth wall to emphasize that it's just meant to be read as a story.
Hello Historyman:- Now Empowered is a book which is constantly in and out of my local library, and, sadly, rather more in than out. So I can pick that up when I'm in next week.
DeleteI've never managed to "get" why Flex is such a respected series. It seems so incredibly obvious to my poor old brain, and it comes from the period when GM was starting to write Doom Patrol with less and less discipline and more and more out-there ambition. I prefer the earlier stuff when it had tunes, m'self. Having said that, I've not read FM since it was released way back in the wretched nineties, so it may well turn out to be a rather splendid and unfairly judged masterpiece.
I too missed FCBD. I always manage to miss it. Still, there's not much I regret not getting hold of. I suppose there's so much that's great to read, and such a great pile of stuff to catch up with, that it's hard to feel that I need even more material unless I'm entirely unfamiliar with it AND it looks pretty good.
That's the definition of affluence, Mr H; not aspiring after free comics.
Shoot, no Voodoo Child ...
ReplyDeleteYeah, I'd like to see Night Force too!
Oh, and are you being digital? Tis a Bank holiday week, darn it.
HelloMartin:-The problem with trying to write about Voodoo is that got there first and zipped it up. For example;
Delete"Not helping is the narration from writer Selwyn Seyfu Hinds that reaches for the musical, aims for significance, but in fact recalls the poetry of teenage Sandman fans."
Yep,that says it.
I will have to go digital, I think, though I'll try to get hard copies before posting at the end of the week. You do this all the time, don't you? As the youthful members of society once and possibly still say; Respect.
Thinking on, though, Skippy's reason for suggesting Avenging Spider-Man is good … seriously, did you ever read the Heralds mini series, a couple of years back? Lots of promise that petered out in a fug of superheroine jokes.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I adored Kathryn Immonen's Thing/Namor story in Marvel Vs #1 - pithy fun, it was.
Hello Martin:- Boy, I'm out of my league now! The Heralds series I missed entirely, and I don't even recognise the title of the comic the Thing/Namor story in, though I'm immediately intrigued by the tale itself.
Delete"a fug of superheroine jokes"? For ill or good, it at least sounds interesting...
I shall add your vote for Avenging Spider-Man.Thank you for that.
Ah, sorry Colin, I misunderstood, and thought you were posting reviews on Wednesday. Friday should be OK. I don't buy many copies on digital, though I should ... save a bit of cash on titles that sit around.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the Voodoo Child compliment, that means a lot.
Fun Fact: The Thing/Namor thing (namor) was in Avengers Vs X-Men Vs #1 - or whatever it's called - a couple of weeks back.
Hello Martin:- I hope Friday will be alright. Still, being out in the sticks, there's no way of being sure that the likes of Scooby Doo, if it ends up in the top 3, will be on the shelves. I don't mean by that the the local shops - if 'local' is the right world - are in any way to blame. But less demand, less product.
DeleteVoodoo Child "compliment"? Flash-fact, Mr M.
Was the Thing/Namor fight in AvX#1? I read that! How could my memory delete that? I will go back.
But have you read AvX#3. It's SO unbelievably awful that I couldn't even dream of thinking about. It makes NO sense at all. By the time Cap dumps Logan in the wilderness, I'd lost any sense of what the *!$% Marvel are up to. Strange days.
Ah see, Colin, the Cap/Logan thing was in Avengers Vs X-Men #3 whereas Ben vs Subby and Iron Man vs Magneto was in the spin off title, Vs #1 - clear as mud, I know.
ReplyDeleteThe Cap business made no sense ('Get out, Pointy Shrimp who would kill Ginger Hope!) given that he recruited Logan for the Avengers as the person who would kill when necessary. Or am I misremembering?
Hello Martin:- OK. So there's a title called "Vs" as well as "AvX", at least as far as fan-chat goes. Well, at least the industry's not going to confuse even long-term fans.
DeleteYou're not misremembering, or I am too. The whole issue was one example of contempt for the audience after another. Pah. I've never been more ... shall I say disappointed with the company than I am today.
THAT'LL upset them, I bet.
First of all I wanted to say that I’ve been a great fan of your blog for a long time now (ever since someone on Tumblr linked to your articles about superheroes and fascism). It always gives me food for thought and I honestly believe you’re one of the more thoughtful comicsbloggers out there.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, this suggestion doesn’t fit your criteria at all but while reading through your blog I noticed that some comics that get a lot of praise in my comics reading circle (teens and 20-somethings, I’m a 21-year-old myself) are comics that you yourself may not have read. (not an accusation! Just something that made me curious)
Ahem, anyway, I was wondering whether you’ve read the first Blue Beetle ongoing featuring Jaime Reyes (Blue Beetle v.8, [2006-2009]). I thought it might be interesting for you, because Jaime’s getting something of a push in DC animation despite being one of DC's newest creations (he was a major secondary character in Batman: The Brave and The Bold, he’s a new team member in Young Justice season 2) and then there are those plans for a Blue Beetle live action series (I doubt it’s going to happen, but they did make some test footage you can find on YouTube). I’ve always found the differences in choices wrt to comics (done for a niche group of fans) and animation (especially DC excels in all-ages cartoons that appeal to not only children but also older folks) interesting. So while Blue Beetle floundered in the sales (despite great and hilarious writing by John Rogers and Keith Giffen, art by Cully Hamner and Rafael Albuquerque. This is of course talking about the pre-DCnU Blue Beetle, you probably wouldn’t be too impressed by the unnecessary reboot.) people involved in comics adaptations seem to realize that Jaime has some great potential: His original series took place in El Paso, he’s a smart Latino teen with a supportive family (they know about his powers) and great friends (also Latin@) and origins that, while connected to the other Blue Beetles, could easily stand on their own.
Here's one of those moments that made me buy this series: http://asylums.insanejournal.com/scans_daily/867579.html
I'm actually pretty sure that if the trades for this run aren't out of trade now, they will be soon, to make place for the reboot, which is a shame because it's just so much better.
Hello There;- Thank you! Your kind words are much appreciated.
DeleteI'm not in the leats bit offended by your pointing out books which I might have missed. Quite the opposite. I'd very much appreciate hearing your suggestions. There's SO much that can be missed, and even if not missed, under-estimated. For example, I have read those Blue Beetle issues, and I've actually got all the trades up until the last two, but I would readily concede that I may very well need to go back and at the least discover why I never really warmed to a comic which so many other folks did. I always enjoyed the book, and appreciated the fact that it wasn't concerned with matters more diverse than trad. whitebread fare. My problem was always that I felt that it lacked - for want of a better word - density. I never quite felt that I was getting a comic book that took long enough to read, which sounds terrible, as if I'm measuring quality by the yard! I suspect that I may well have jumped to the wrong conclusion, given that (1) I still recall the book fondly and (2) a great many good folks are still enthusiastic about its virtues. You're not the first person to mention the book to me recently, so I will be taking advice and hunting out my TPBs.
I loved BB in the Brave and the Bold cartoons, though Young Justice - as far as I know - hasn't appeared on this side of the Pond yet. The New 52 version? You've accurately guessed my opinion, I fear.
Thanks for the nudge :) I'll certainly go back when I've a moment and check out my first impressions.
Ah, I agree that Blue Beetle sometimes came close to decompressing too much (though not as bad and obnoxious as DCnU comics. Actually, decompression is one of the things I dislike most about the DCnU and a lot of the comics DC produced just before Flashpoint. They really took it to another level.) but I always felt that the good humor and flashy appealing art combined with the neat storylines made it a great teen comic (with a likeable and incredibly adorable main character, you can't underestimate that with teens and especially the ladies! :)). I usually pick up a book when I want density, which probably says sad things about most of my comics reading choices, though I'm always delighted when I read a comic that takes a long time to process. I do have to say that I'm a tradewaiter (I'm actually on your side of the pond and it's much cheaper and easier to go with trades in my country!) which probably means that slight decompression isn't such a problem. I've noticed that I have a lot less patience when I read single issues (rock bottom must've been one of the pre-DCnU Flash issues leading up to Flashpoint, which took a whopping 4 minutes to read)
DeleteThe Young Justice cartoon has its faults (rocky start and all) but it's hilarious how they've succeeded at streamlining the DCU in a way that makes the DCnU look very bad. Chances are that if you really miss a character in the DCnU, you'll find that character in Young Justice. (Also, great character and costume designs that won the show an Emmy. When you make Adam Strange look good enough for the 21st century, that's a win: http://jla-yj-jl.tumblr.com/post/22577308321/adam-strange-rannian-attire-young-justice)
Hello There:- It strikes me that I'm in agreement with a great deal of what you say. I certainly think the tendency of the collected edition to give the impression of weight to a collection of thin, unsatisfying issues has been a really dysfunctional get-out clause for the comics industry. Even though the Big Two - and it must be said much of the American industry - talks about no longer creating for the trade, the standards of what is and what isn't "dense" have been altered by years of read-it-in-a-minute storytelling. You're quite right about the likes of the pre-Flashpoint Flashes, which I had a good moan about myself here, but I can't say that the post-Flashpoint Flash issues are all THAT different. Yes, they're better, yes they have some imaginative moments, but they're still thin, thin comics, and I've yet to see anything more convincing than standard-issue comics angst in the pages of the new/old fastest man alive. And of course stinting on the individual issues only encourages folks either to stop buying or to wait for the trade, which just cuts into the industry's profit margins. Daft, daft and more daft.
DeleteReading your second paragraph, I find that I've no doubt that the Young Justice cartoon creates a more streamlined and satisfied take on the DCU that the N52. After all, all the cartoons have done so since BAS have done so, to a greater or lesser degree, with the JLU cartoons being, for my money, the pick of the bunch. I hope that Young Justice, rough stuff and all, trumps that show, because any such an experience would be welcome. Thank you for the link:- that's an interesting Adam Strange. Of course, I grew up with early-70s reprints of Infantino/Anderson classics, so I'm partial to the silver half-moon-topped helmet'n'all. But it does look like an interesting take, no doubt about it.
Hi Colin,
ReplyDeleteI liked your comment re BKV's 'Saga' - the reviews I read didn't really inspire me to pick it up at all, because my major irritation with 'Y, The Last Man' was that it read to me to as really mediocre SF that if had it been published as a novel would have had a small intial print run and then sunk without a trace. 'Saga' sounds to me a lot like it will be BKV's 'mediocre space opera novel'.
A bit sad that such mediocre stuff like 'Y, The Last Man' gets such praise when there are far far better SF graphic novels like 'The First Kingdom', the 'Aldebaran' series or "The Adventures of Luthor Arkwright' out there.
kiwijohn
Hello Kiwijohn:- I'd love to reply to your comment in the "reply" box, but Blogger won't let me. Pah. And yet, shouldn't complain about free goods which largely work well. So I shan't.
ReplyDeleteSssshhhhh about Y: The Last Man and Saga. These are almost universally well-loved, and even those who are doubtful about the second adore the first. And all power to them,of course. It's just that I can't see the appeal. Adequate, yes. Dense and rewarding, no. But then, I would have said that about, say, Scalped just last year, and now I know I was wrong there. In fact I'm always wrong. So I expect to be behind Y et al very soon.
But until then: not impressed.
Probably late to this, Colin, but I'd love you to review Usagi Yojimbo in the future (probably my favorite comic of the past couple of years).
ReplyDeleteI'd also be interested in what you think of Crossed (!!!).
Hello Matthew:- Not too late at all. Thank you for your suggestions. I've been taking to have another look at UY anyway; your nudge just sends me over that-a-ways quicker.
DeleteCrossed? What I've read has been just a touch too relentlessly grim for my tastes, but perhaps I just need to read more.
It never hurts to read more comics, after all ... :)