Monday, 11 June 2012

A Contest Of Champions!

Flo Steinberg, the Invisible Girl, in Lee & Kirby's What If The Original Marvel Bullpen Had Become The Fantastic Four, from What If #11.

My sincerest thanks to the folks who entered last week's entirely indefensible competition. The whole process was a welcome relief in the middle of a hectic, and often entirely silly, week, and I tip my hat to everyone who popped over, who left a comment, or who even took a moment to stake a claim to the ultimate unimpressive prize. There's nothing like a "name-the-toy" competition offering a completely worthless reward to restore and maintain a sense of perspective.

The winner - taa daa! - was Brigonos, whose efforts have secured the dubious honour of nominating whichever of this week's books he'd most like to see reviewed here on TooBusyThinking. Alternatively, Mr B is welcome to the other optional first prize, which is to not bother at all, because, let's face it, there's always a great many other things to be getting on with. For those who may not know, Brigonos is, in his secret identity, the artist Bryan Coyle, whose graphic novel "Babble", created with writer Lee Robson, has been acquired by publisher Com.X.

And no, neither of them asked me to mention that. They may even ask me to remove the reference, if it comes across as a shameless plug.
  

(Top line) B'Dg, Spider-Man, Tom Baker Doctor head, Dalek, Captain Britain, Zilius Zog, Deadpool, Batman, Bronze Tiger, Catman, Harry Potter, Nemesis, Bwana Beast, Dr Fate (Bottom line) Green Arrow’s boxing glove arrow, Dash, Basil Brush, a  Rory Pond head, the 11th Doctor, Amy Pond, River Song, Rory Pond, Black Panther, The Demon, Gentleman Ghost, Firestorm, Black Widow, Iron Giant, Judge Dredd, Wonder Woman, Weeping Angel, Wildcat, Red Skull, Bouncing Boy, Captain America, Thunderbird 3.


Close behind Mr B came a cluster of splendid chaps, namely Martin, Julien, Adrian, Joe, Figserrello and Harvey. I've asked these field-leaders if they wouldn't mind nominating a comic or two that I might discuss in a new bite-size review column. (In a piece in yesterday's Observer, Gary Marcus discussed how important it is, when working off a long apprenticeship, to focus on weaknesses, and brevity's one of just a host of mine.) Then arrived a tiny splatter of entrants who oddly didn't seem to be trying very hard at all, offering instead some strange messages that seemed to be deeply concerned with the superhero's right to torture, the evils of feminism, and the perils of over-thinking. I decided that I ought to regard these as "Art", and as such, I regret that the rules of the competition prevent me from rewarding them. Still, who isn't warmed by the sight of men - and they're nearly always apparently men - expressing their nasty little inner child?

nb: So far, Brigonos had opted for the UK Thundercats comic, Adrian has chosen Kiss #1, Martin's gone for Spider-Men #1, Figserrello for Invincible #92, and Joe for Conan The Barbarian #5. Thank you, kind commentors.   
          
From The Strange Case Of The Diabolical Puppet by Finger, Kane, Robinson & Roussos, in Batman #3, Fall 1940
           
And behind those insignificant and passing rainclouds came the seven billion or so of the world's population who - incredibly -  don't seem to have felt motivated to take a punt on this competition at all. Unbelievable, I know.

I hope the day's been kind to everyone who finds themselves looking at this sentence, and indeed any of those around it. Thank you for popping over. I hope I might see you over this way again.       

.

8 comments:

  1. Well, thanks so much for the answers, the plug and the chance to nominate! Oh, I think I'll be mean and go for Spider-Men #1. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- Well thank you for entering, though I feel that, yes, there is a certain degree of a challenge appearing in the form of Spider-Men. But it could be great, it really could be! Having just read The Death Of Spider-Man, Ultimate Fall-Out and the first "new" Spidey collection, I'd have to say I doubt it. But I would love to see that run broken up by an excellent comic.

      Delete
    2. I AM YOUR KING NOW.

      I suppose taking the time to respond to critical appraisal of his books with the grace and etiquette for which he is rightly famed at least gives The Amazing Spider-Editor something to do with all that free time he has in the day, so I can't begrudge Martin suggesting what he has.
      I do go on far too much about my dislike for Spider-Man as a character but rarely qualify it by pointing out that Peter Parker is the problem for me and USM's stunt-recasting was something I was actually looking forward to. I totally relate to the adventures of the mixed-race super-genius protagonist as he wrestles with supervillain family members and life in a boarding school for super-boffins - but enough about Peter David's 20 year-old Spider-Man 2099 series, I believe we were talking about the groundbreaking Ultimate Spider-Man relaunch..?
      I suspect USM shares a lot with Invincible, too, so I look forward to seeing what you make of it all, Colin.

      Delete
    3. ALL HAIL KING BRIGONOS, FOR WHOSE WHIM A COPY OF THUNDERCATS MAGAZINE WAS THIS VERY MORNING BOUGHTEN. FOURSOOTH.

      Oh, dear. It is true that Wacker the Flakker (c: Figserello 2012) may have something to do with Martin's choice, but on my blogger's honour, I shan't let that get in the way of my appreciation or not of the title. After all, I'm hardly going to suddenly decide that Daredevil, for example, has suddenly become a terrible comic, or pretend that WTF has had nothing to do with its virtues. That really would be the heinous crime of "over-thinking". I suspect.

      These Reader's Roulette (c. Brigonos 2012) choices really are pushing me out of the old comfort zone. I haven't the faintest how to review the Thundercats, and the Dandy is the same. Which is, of course, the point. Reviews are great for demanding brevity, clarity and a lack of cliche. Nightmare things then.

      You know, I never twigged the similarities between Spidey 2099 and the new USM. I suppose a franchise character of S-M's stature will inevitably have had so many analogues that it's hard to start from scratch. Still, I used to be very fond of SM2099 in the day. There were months, if memory serves, when about the only super-books worth buying were that and Flash.

      Delete
  2. Hi Colin, you say 'Oh, dear. It is true that Wacker the Flakker (c: Figserello 2012) may have something to do with Martin's choice' but I swear, he didn't. I just found the idea of a new Bendis-scripted book pairing his two Ultimate Spider-Men intriguing, knowing that you have a wonderfully clear view of the writer's strengths and weaknesses. It was only afterwards that I remembered all the business of last week - I can be terribly dense - hence my supplementary email saying that maybe you wouldn't wish to review Spider-Men #1, and that'd be fine.

    I'm not really such a stirrer.

    (Off to bed now, delighted by the accidental rhyme that is 'dense - hence'!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- You're quite right, that comment could read as if I was ascribing a measure of playful motives to your choice rather than raising the possibility in a tongue-in-cheek fashion, as I'd intended . I never thought of that as a problem, and in fact never thought at all, which means that it's me that's been terribly dense. I was simply responding to Mr B by saying what I meant to read as "that may be a playful part of it, or it may not". I hadn't thought of it as a problem before, I wasn't thinking of it then, and I didn't mean to imply anything negative at all. I had a vague sense of something similar to two Sunday cricketers looking forward to a game where one of the opposition is a well-known sledger, but that would have made me smile rather than anything else. In truth, my intention was really to take the opportunity to say that I accepted SW was involved with good comics, as he of course is, and that I wasn't going to be a bad egg about it all. That was what I was registering. Mea culpa, which I seem to be saying far too often.

      I've not even clocked your e-mail. You're the kindest and most generous of blokes, and even had there been a gentle ribbing involved in your choice, I'd have thought it a pleasure to be bantering with you about a matter which is, after all, quite harmless.

      Top rapping in the above, I will indeed concede :)

      I hope this makes some kind of sense. It's 3.13 and I've just been woken up by an almighty crash downstairs. I thought I'd check the net after encountering some very blase cats who seem to feel they're innocent of everything. It may not be the best time to be writing comments, but I did want to, and, er, I have.

      Delete
  3. Ooooh, consolation prize! You're too kind, as usual. Again, thank you.

    Well, i won't be as mean as some of my fellows here (shame on you Mr Gray and i'll try to suggest something remotely worthy of interest, even though the list of comics this week isn't terribly inspiring (at least to me). I would have loved to find you a cool manga....

    Well, let's go for Megaman 14 then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Julien:- I'm not sure 'consolation' is the right word. I suspect that "extra responsibility" is closer to the truth. But Megaman #14 it is, and thank you for that, despite having NO idea what Megaman might be!

      I must say that Martin bears no shame even on the playful, friendly level which I know you're joshing him on :) He was indeed elsewhere in the real world and the blogosphere on the long weekend of Wakkerdom, and had indeed mentioned that to me afterwards. Which just proves what a terrible memory I can have!

      Anyway, consolation prize winners get to pull the Flakkers tail! It's in the rules, it is :)

      Delete