Thursday, 21 June 2012

On "The Dandy": Reader's Roulette 2:5

Jamie Smart's wonderful cover to the Jubilee issue of The Dandy

There are situations which can be made funny, and situations which simply are funny. Comedy creators will invest their lives crafting quips to bring well-worn scenarios to life; “lovers quarreling over breakfast”, “criminals caught red-handed at the scene of the crime”, and so on and on. But the idea that’s so audaciously daft that it sparks off chuckling almost regardless of what’s been done with it is a far rarer phenomena. Andy Fanton’s CIB: Cavemen In Black is a prime example of the kind of apparently good-for-nothing silliness which smart cartoonists train themselves to recognise and run with. What might flit briefly across the minds of the rest of us – and that’s if we’re lucky - before disappearing forever as an idle and worthless conceit can serve as the glitter of a gag-spinning motherlode to those up to recognising the signs.  Zealous, incompetent stone-age secret agents hunting down harmless dinosaur illegal immigrants? And with these Agents B and C dressed in bedraggled jaguar-black skins and wearing slate-lensed sunglasses too, in what’s the very opposite of the sweatless cool of Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones? If Fanton had done nothing but set up that premise, and he does more than that, then it alone would’ve made The Dandy worth investing in.

Andy Fanton’s CIB: Cavemen In Black
        
Yet CIB: Men In Black was only the point at which I felt compelled to concede that The Dandy is anything but a relic. There’d already been several considerable involuntary laughs before that. But I’d not read The Dandy for almost forty years, and I was never was a fan of it in the first place. It was always a given that it was a staid, archaic grind of a little kid’s comic, as obvious as it was predictable and backwards-looking. Whether that was a fair judgment or not, it’s the opinion I’ve long had filed away in that place where assumptions calcify into prejudice. And prejudice being what it is, the obvious absence of what I was expecting to see initially appeared far more noteworthy than the sequence of always-lively and often-ingenious strips I was unexpectedly encountering.

Steve Bright’s wryly feminist Beryl The Peril
       
The truth took a while to dawn. At first, I thought that the determinedly contemporary style guide which seems to influence everything in The Dandy from logos to often dialogue-dense frames might be masking the heritage industry storytelling I’d been anticipating. Yet the evidence that that’s simply not so was there on Jamie Smart’s surreal cover wink to the Jubilee, in which Desperate Dan fights to hold onto the illusion that he’s a king celebrating a public anniversary while insisting that the pig at his side is a corgi. From that point onwards, the evidence piled up as one sharp-minded, all-ages strip followed another. There's Smart’s own Mega-Lo Maniacs strip, featuring a portable tyrant of a sea-god reliant on the youthful Rory to ferry him to the beach and his chance at world domination. And there's Wilbur Dawbarn’s exquisitely cruel Mr Meecher The Uncool Teacher, presenting us with a picture of a thoroughly depressed and anxious young servant of the chalkface which seems worryingly close to my own initial experiences at the front of the classroom. As I say, it's hard maintaining a bias in the face of all this inconveniently compelling evidence.

Alexander Matthew’s Nuke Noodle
           
I certainly wasn’t anticipating such a determination to avoid patronising the audience. The comic's clearly targeted primarily at kids, but the working assumption is obviously that they’re bright and curious readers rather than passive, dull-minded consumers. (Adults who've managed to avoid that state of passivity and dull-mindedness will find much to enjoy here too.) Alexander Matthews' Nuke Noodle kicks off with what’s clearly a Jewish rabbi creating a Golem in 16th century Prague, the Dr Who parody in Nigel Auchterlounie’s The Bogies begins with a paean to the pop culture highlights of 1963, while that man Smart’s The Arena Of Awesome features a cryogenically-preserved Einstein, Zeus, and a chimp homage to Godzilla. There's also politics of an admirably progressive kind to be found here too. The word balloons alone from Steve Bright’s wryly feminist Beryl The Peril can be read off the page to a nearby meal-making Splendid Wife and inspire a genuine chortle.(*1) And while I'm mentioning aspects of The Dandy which were unexpectedly impressive to this exceptionally occasional reader, then there’s certainly a great deal that other comics on both sides of the Pond could learn from the positive and yet entirely unhectoring representations of race in both Dreadlock Holmes and Superball!

*1:- Or so she assures me. (The strip is, of course, even more entertaining if both the art and the words are consumed together.)

Wilbur Dawbarn’s exquisitely cruel Mr Meecher The Uncool Teacher
           
Today’s Dandy is a smorgasbord of bright, vigorous, canny strips, and a reader more used to consuming the thin fare served up in most American superbooks may find that they lack the stamina to work through all that’s on show in one sitting. (They might also, however, find themselves pleased by the appearance of various parodies of Marvel superheroes in the book, with Thor, Hulk and Wolverine all receiving brief but fond tips of the hat.) Though there’s an obvious editorial intent to ensure that the comic appears kinetically 2012, there’s still a range of storytelling approaches on display from the relatively sedate and good-humoured Bananaman to Jamie Smart’s purposefully crowded, thick-lined, and exuberant designs. Only the persistently bland logos seem to lack the sense of wit and determination which otherwise consistently characterises the comic’s pages. Indeed, it’s only when a reader notes that The Dandy’s biggest disappointment lies in its mostly only-adequate logos that its success becomes obvious. For if that's the worst that a finicky reviewer can find to say about it, then it seems that The Dandy really is worth a second glance from even the most cynical reader.

Reader Roulette Rating: Go buy! There's a great many strips I didn't have space to mention here, and new ones on the way, it seems, so; Go Buy!
.
Jamie Smart’s Mega-Lo Maniac
.

26 comments:

  1. Enjoyed the article Colin and probably relieved for your sake that you've had a bit of baggage-free simple enjoyment this weather.

    When I was a nipper in the '80s The Dandy seemed pretty old-timey and staid compared to the spikiness of The Beano, Desperate Dan seen as old style Jim Reeves Country and Western compared to the Punk Pop fizz of Dennis the Menace.

    Obviously, due to now cack-handedly pretending to be an adult, haven't read either in over 20 years.

    Good to see there's a real anarchic energy which bounces off things in the world around kid's now going on it. It seems to have moved well away from the tried and tested farm of DC Thompson artists and from your samples looks like a hop and a skip away from the best that the more humorous end of the UK small press community has to offer.

    A well crafted throw away chortle can be a lot more meaningful and special than the turgid, hollow posturing that you seem to have to wade through usually this weather in supersville.

    I remember reading online somewhere in the last few years that the Dandy's circulation is just over the 5,000 mark which if true, is peanuts. Hopefully it has a stable enough base to march on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Alfie:- Before replying, I've just realised that that splendid Super-Beatles picture I've seen on the net is yours! Oh, THAT Alfie Gallagher! Terrific work, Mr G. I wish there was a graphic novel coming! (I know, I know ... ) Those who don't know what I'm talking about should head here;

      http://alfiegallagher.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/super-beatles.html

      Come pay-day I'll be heading towards your store!

      I'm glad to see that I'm not the only person who's carried a sense of what The Dandy WAS into the present day. It's impossible to avoid, isn't it, and that's especially so when the old product was so ... tired. And I'm relieved that I got some of my enthusiasm across. I really struggled to find a way to write about this, and I'm keenly aware that I didn't crack the problem. Still, practise making .... somewhere to start the next round of practise, I guess. I certainly hoped that the scans would say what I wanted to!

      I wish there was more of this invention and cheer in the superbook. It's been a real inspiration to read the comic and start thinking about what I'm reading here might be used in what goes on over there, in what you splendidly call supersville.

      I thought The Dandy's circulation was about 20 000, but I've no idea where that figure came from. That would be regretable enough. But 5000, and with a product that's this good? That would be a terrible shame. Perhaps I'll manage to encourage just one or two people to pick up a copy. That would be a heartening thought.

      Delete
  2. I'll have you know I don't take too well to outright praise. Working on a Pepperland Superhero comic is something I can only daydream about.

    The 5,000+ figure does seem insanely low so must be a bit of misinformation or mistake on my part.

    20,000 though still is pretty low. From my own experience of having a nephew who is the right age for the Dandy, he isn't even aware of it or the Beano and largely seems to be only interested in so called 'comics' (which have next to no comic material) which are tied into 'Mega-Go-Go-Moshi-Moshi-Mon' or whatever is the big playground toy/collectables craze of the moment.

    From what I see on ground level though, kids comics such as the Dandy or Beano just aren't as readily available or distributed as they used to be. I think also (unfounded opinion alert!), some kids who get comics are getting them picked up due to their own fathers nostalgia, and the numbers reading through this stream is going to be whittled down through diminishing returns.

    By the way, is Winker Watson still in it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Alfie:- You know, the best way to avoid that outright praise is to produce notably poor work. I've always found that's helped me not feel cornered by any signs of public applause :) But one day, I will make the mistake of achieving something good ....

      A Pepperland Superhero book? How wonderful would that be?

      I think that all of your suggestions re: The Dandy's low circulation make perfect sense. I actually couldn't find a copy anywhere for several weeks and in the end had to contact The Dandy direct. Strangely, The Beano seems strangely easy to find by comparison out here in the Windswept East Of England.

      I can't recall Mr W. Watson making an appearance in The Dandy. Nor do I know of said Mr Watson. What I do know is that it's tough not to make a wisecrack at this point ...

      Delete
    2. Winker's not a regular, but he does turn up now and again: a while back there was a Mr. Meecher strip where he falls asleep and dreams he's teaching Winker. It was a loving homage, right down to the red-white-and-orange colour scheme.

      He'll also be in the 2013 annual, again drawn by Mr. Meecher's Wilbur Dawbarn.

      Delete
    3. Hello Neil:- Thank you for the information :) It's much appreciated.

      Poor Mr Meecher ....

      Delete
  3. Regarding the cover: it's the wide-eyed pig saying "woof" that makes it work. That's the little touch that elevates the piece from fairly amusing to damn funny. NOW THAT'S QUALITY WORK!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Harvey:- Agreed! The Splendid Wife and I were discussing that very point last night. You might like to check out Mr Smart's blog. He's gone from bloke-I-know-nothing-about to gosh-he's-good-I'll-buy-everything-he-does in about 5 days;

      http://www.fumboo.com/category/blog/

      Delete
  4. So I guess I need to pick up the Dandy then!

    (Also the Beano, as I saw the front cover warning us that the Phantom Farter's secret ID would finally be revealed! Who is this dread villain?!)

    - Charles RB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Charles:- Oh, do pick up The Dandy. It's splendid. I wasn't so taken by the Beano a year or so ago, but then, I'm not sure I see anything the same way anymore. I guess I'll go check out the Beano too.

      Who is that dread villain? I guess we'll soon be finding out. As it were.

      Delete
    2. Bum! Kept looking and no shop had the Dandy. I've got three more options and then I'm sunk. The Beano wasn't around much either. (Maybe they've all been bought already? Let's hope)

      I can happily report that in the Beano, Dennis gets out of a test by feeding his teacher crisps that cause her to fart the test papers out of a window.

      - Charles RB

      Delete
    3. Hello Charles:- It IS incredibly hard to track down a copy of The Dandy. That's a damn shame. I struggled to find up-to-date copies on E-Bay too. If the comics not out there, it can't get the reader's it deserves. Straight-forward, I know, and yet if a comic's not selling, how does it get the shelf-space to do so?

      I'm glad you got a buzz from The Beano. I'll be tracking a copy down this week :)

      Delete
    4. I found the latest issue! Sorry Alan Moore, this is probably the best English-language comic this week (my favourite bit is the Dandy editor being haunted by the ghost of Smiley Sam)

      One odd thing, both the Beano and the Dandy have two completely different Bananaman comics. I wonder which one is the Earth-2 Bananaman?

      - Charles RB

      Delete
    5. Hello Charles:- After all this time, I've finally recommended something to make you smile :) I regard this as being a privilege.

      I've not got this weeks issue yet, but I will track it down. (The Earth-2 Bananaman? There has to be a story in that :))

      Delete
  5. This is the first review I've seen of the new-look Dandy which captures my thoughts - I've read positive reviews from long-time fans, along with "oh-God-they've-ruined-it" rants, but this is the first I've seen someone acknowledge the current take as a major step in the right direction.

    As a kid in the nineties (showing my youth here) I read the Beano and the Dandy regularly, but always felt a little lukewarm. I got a kind of ritualistic satisfaction out of following familiar characters such as Dennis and Dan week after week, but they never really captured me the way (say) Asterix or Calvin and Hobbes did. Above all, I think, they were just too tame and formulaic. Small wonder that they were parodied by readers in Viz, and even by the artists in Oink.

    I believe Alan Moore once described the Beano and Dandy as "something you just had, like rickets", which is a good way of putting it.

    Leo Baxendale has a quote from Donald Rooum on his website: "I was an art student in 1953, when the art schools suddenly became aware of the Beano. The strips were anonymous, but it was obvious that a real original was waking up the dead world of comics, a methodical zealot for belly laughs, devoid of respect for convention. We called him the Master of Bash Street." This is interesting as it mirrors my own thoughts as a kid forty years later: the strips were largely unremarkable, except for the occasional out-there gem such as Calamity James in the Beano or Blinky in the Dandy.

    I came across Baxendale's work as a child when I found a copy of his biography A Very Funny Business, and even then I could see that his work was a cut above most of the fare being printed in the present. Looking back, something I find interesting is that, when I was 11, the reprint title Classics from the Comics came out. By then I felt I was a bit old for the Beano and the dandy, but I had no qualms about buying Classics now and again to enjoy the work of Baxendale and Reid.

    So I think it's safe to say that, for decades, the Beano, the Dandy and their dear departed comrades consisted mainly of bland, run-of-the-mill fare with a few delights thrown in.

    I don't blame the cartoonists for this, since in many (most?) cases they didnt actually write the scripts. It's safe to say that the best results come when the editors let the cartoonists off the lead, and the new Dandy does just that. I would've loved it as a kid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Neil:- That's tremendously heartening to find that my thoughts aren't entirely off the beam. Thank you for saying so. I too came across a huge amount of debate about The Dandy, but because I just never saw the comic when out and about, I didn't actually see what had inspired the conflict. Yet if what's in the comic was in it about a year or so ago, then I'm amazed there was an quibbling at all. It is, as you say, very good stuff.

      Similarly, I agree with you about the fact that the Beano and the Dandy never captured me. Even the Power comics and Whizzer And Chips seemed far more vigorous and contemporary when I was a nipper. (Great Alan Moore quote, BTW.)

      Of course there were exceptions. For one, Leo Baxendale's work always shone with invention and energy. Reid I obviously don't know nearly enough about, so that's something I must check out.

      Reading your comment through again, I realise how astonished I am - even after writing the above - to find that I share your high regard for today's Dandy. But I like such splendid surprises, and I like being proven wrong when the result is more fine comics to enjoy.

      And yes, you're right; I too would have LOVED this take on The Dandy as a nipper. And it might have warned me off teaching too ...

      Delete
    2. Yes, I think I preferred W&C and the other IPC titles a a kid - only thing was, they were on their last legs in the nineties.

      But even then they often had the sense that they were formulaic, and above all, written down. I remember one strip where a guy drops a pile of plates after washing up, and instead of saying "erk" or "oops" or "aargh" or something believable, he said "oh no, the dishes have slipped out of my wet hands". As a kid I found that rather ridiculous, like I was having everything spelt out to me.

      (Altough I'd like to put in a good word for Sparky in the seventies. I used to love reading reprints of Puss an' Boots, Spoofer and L Cars - they never felt written down.)

      Some of the debates about the modern Dandy may have actually arisen from the previous incarnation - a few years ago it was renamed "Dandy Xtreme" and packaged itself as a kids' magazine (with features on films, video games etc) which happened to have a few comic strips thrown in. Comic fans rightly found the situation disheartening, although I never thought the strips themselves were too bad. If they had a problem it's that a number of them were a bit too Poochie - trying too hard to be cool. Mr. Meecher is basically the antithesis to that, come to think of it...

      I'm pretty sure the Dreadlock Holmes strip in this issue is a reprint from this era, and it's fairly representative. You can see it as a bit of a transitional phase between old, traditional strips and new, wilder ones.

      But yes, the current incarnation has its detractors as well. Here's a review of the first new-look issue:

      http://signorestudios.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/not-so-dandy.html

      I think it's a fair point that, early on, this incarnation had perhaps too much emphasis on celebrity spoofs and toilet humour, but it was still finding its feet, even there was still a definite spark to it.

      In the end, it seems that these people just want tradition to be upheld for the sake of it - even though it would almost certainly kill the comic.

      Delete
    3. Hello Neil:- I confess, I have no idea what happened in the British weekly comic after the early 70s. By that time, and with the exception of old TV21s, Trigan Empire and Dan Dare collections, my tastes were entirely focused on the other side of the Atlantic. It was a big mistake, of course. Not just because I missed out even on 2000AD, which it took me half-a-decade to get a proper taste, but because I missed so much of the last years of the girl's comics, sports strips, and classics such as Charley's War. Worse yet, the experience of buying such a wide variety of weekly comics is now lost forever. Little of what was on sale was excellent, but little of anything is. It was a culture which I'd have benefited from experiencing and I regret not doing so.

      Thank you for the background on The Dandy-Wars. The review you linked does seem to be describing what in many ways was a different comic to today, although the style guide was obviously in effect. I can certainly believe that the Dreadlock Holmes story I read was from a different era. It does seem more sedate than most of the other current features. But then, I appreciate having a variety of styles on show, and as I said, it's such a relief to see positive representatives in Brit comics that that alone is a plus.

      I agree entirely about the stifling longing for tradition to be maintained. There's nothing in Pop Culture which is improved by standing still, ignoring the age and repeating what's long ago been codified. I appreciate the Dandy's current comics-daring, and I hope that a few more might check the comic out through the combined efforts of everyone who's discussing the book, and its peers, on the net. I'd be happy to be the most minor of foot-soldiers in such a campaign :)

      Delete
  6. Yay, for the Dandy!
    Yay, for good kids comics!
    Yay, for the wonderful Jamie Smart!
    Yay, for an overwhelmingly positive edition of Readers' Roulette!

    (I did contemplate writing a grownup response to this comic, but "yay!" felt more appropriate.)

    Yay!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mark:- Thank you1 Thank you! That's a grown-up response where I come from. I'm SO with you where your Yays! are concerned.

      And I think this shows how really good the Readers Roulette polls are for me. I say that knowing that that's an entirely selfish thing. But it's been really good for me. I'd never have read The Dandy otherwise, to mention but one of many positive results. And it's been grand to feel so ... so .... Yayey.

      As it were :)

      Delete
  7. As a long time fan of comics, I buy the occasional Beano or Dandy to keep up with strip and format changes. My ten year old nephew, who had previously no interest in the "dandy extreme" (DC Thomson's attempt at a rival to 'Toxic') started to buy it when it changed to the new format, you review, primarily because harry hill was on the front cover, and, he was a great fan of tv show "TV burp". I think the recent further fall in circulation may have been partly due to "tv burp" finishing and harry hill similarly leaving 'the dandy' (I think Hill has signed an exclusive contract with channel four or BBC and is on 'sabbatical' which may have coincided with his disappearance from the comic - I believe he had explicitly given his permission for his image to be used to support' the dandy') as he was certainly 'the hook' that got the nephew involved. However, I also agree that in the same way that when I see an old episode of 'morse' or 'midsommer murders' and people are smoking in pubs, it looks weirdly wrong, 'the dandy's cover - without a free gift - looks wrong. And if the neanderthal, sheepish part of my adult brain unconsciously gets that message, how much more so, a kid-child-creature? With the absence of ' TV burp' perhaps one ray of hope would be the beeb or itv producing a "dandy " tv show, a mixture of sketches and veeery short animation pieces. I know the beeb have rules on promoting commercial products and had to sell Andrew Lloyd webber to itv, but "horrible histories" reigns supreme and.surely the crazy dandy sketch show, would amount to the same thing. The awards horrible histories has garnered and the ad revenue tv burp could boast, would surely mean" the dandy" with its similar style of surreal-sniggers would be a shoe-in. Hope this message is received as this is my.first internet experience!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Jerry:- Message received, understood and appreciated!

      I appreciate your ideas here, given that you're touching on issues which I fear I know nothing of. For example, I've no nippers around to help me grasp why they do and they don't buy a particular comic. Indeed, I'm so out of the loop where the mass-media is concerned that I can't say I've ever watched more of a moment of Harry Hill and I know nothing of his cultural importancein the past few years. One thing I do regret about having left teaching circa 2005 is that I no longer discover such things siimply through being in the classroom. It's remarkable how much I learned in that way, and how much that imput is missed now.

      I know what you mean about how the image of what a comic is and how it looks can become fixed in the mind. The recent Dandy issues have been the first that I've seen since the 60s which have challenged the sterotype I've long been carrying. When I think of The Dandy now, I think of a 2012 issue with a Jamie Smart cover, and I think that marks how impressed I was with it.

      It is a shame that comics should rely so heavily on media tie-ins. It's not that it wasn't ever thus. TV Funnies, TV Comic, TV 21:- it's l-o-n-g been an incredibly important part of a kid's comics appeal. Yet it seems to be even more important today, and there's few titles out there which aren't TV and/or movie tie-ins. Under those circumstances, it would indeed be good to see the Dandy brand established in other mediums.

      Delete
  8. Wonderful post. That's what we're aiming for with The Dandy and it is a shame that the business model and marketing is so appalling that most people I tell when asked that I work for The Dandy, answer, 'Is it still going?'. The logos from the stories are an editorial choice and I have never liked sticking them on my strip. One small nitpick: My name is Alexander Matthews with an s at the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Alexander:- Firstly, thank you! Secondly, my apology for the typo, which has been corrected immediately.

      It's a terrible shame, for example that The Dandy is available in so few places. I have no doubt that it would sell if it could just be found. An obvious problem, of course, but no less frustrating because of that. I know of nowhere within almost 20 miles which stocks it.

      And I wish it wasn't so, because I do WANT to buy it, and in a social, everyday environment too. It's one quiet way in which the habit gets passed along ..

      Delete
  9. Download it from Newsstand if you have an iPad or similar or get a subscription, that's my advice. You might notice the Beano in pretty much every newsagent in a shiny stand often, too. That's because they sell the Beano on sale or return, but not the Dandy. Where is the Desperate Dan or Bananaman game app? Where are the toys? I can only only conclude that the marketing department are either incompetent or DC Thomson WANT the Dandy to die.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Alexander:- I'm taking the sub offer that's currently up. Though I enjoy alot of what I read digitally, there's material that I'd far rather read in hard-copy. And The Dandy is an example of that.

      I didn't know that The Dandy wasn't sale or return. That's ... not going to help, is it? Even my wife has come home after the recent news stories and said she couldn't see a copy anywhere.

      I totally agree with the matter of marketing. The Dandy has such a fantastic heritage, and it's not being exploited. The value of an established brand with such compelling properties - new and old - is something to cherish, but it needs some elbow grease and innovation to make it work.

      Sigh and sigh again ...

      Delete