Friday, 8 June 2012
On Godzilla #1 by Swierczynski & Gane: Reader's Roulette 2:4
Please do be aware: there be spoilers ahead.
So far, Duane Swierczynski and Simon Gane's Godzilla isn't really about giant monsters at all. Those exceptionally big horrors are present and correct, of course, and they're flattening cities and terrifying innocent citizens just as we'd expect and indeed rather cruelly want them to. But what Forty Stories Of Sheer Terror is really concerned with is the celebrating of machismo. It's a fearsomely blokeish story, in which impossibly tough, intimidatingly bemuscled men of - as we're repeatedly told - "violence" survive the most over-whelming of disasters through their dinosaur-defying powers of uber-manliness.
Our point-of-view character in Godzilla is one Boxer, who once served with the "hardest of the hardboiled" in the British Army and now makes his living as a bodyguard to the hyper-rich. How hard would being the "hardest of the hardboiled" make a man, you might ask, and the answer is that he's not just tougher than your average indomitable hero, but tougher than your average super-hero too. This is a bloke who can climb down thirty and more floors of elevator cable with his bare hands with a fifteen year-old girl hanging onto his neck and the building collapsing around them. (Even having to swing from side to side to avoid a peppering of bullets doesn't slow Boxer down.) Then, with no sign of his palms having been shredded to the bone or his arms exhausted by the experience, Boxer's capable of taking a further at-least two storey tumble in his stride. In fact, he lands on his neck, and yet bounces straight up and tears off in search of safety, making sure to haul his youthful in-her-pyjamas responsibility with him This is a tough, tough hard man, and the way in which Gane gives Boxer a considerable similarity to Popeye can hardly be a coincidence.
Played for laughs, or even with a telling touch of Sly'n'Archie self-depreciation, this might be splendid stuff, but sadly that's not how the tale's told. The absurdly butch is played entirely straight, and the tale lacks even the slightest wink at the audience. Boxer is a throwback to the days when the mannified lead of an actioneer couldn't even wince like John McClane tip-toing over a corridor lined with broken glass. Only the most stereotypical of angst-ridden events can touch this man, it seems, and they're all beats which involve predictable, over-ripe moments of blokeish woe. There's a dead daughter he wasn't there to save, a bitter wife who blames him, and now a slaughtered client of a young lass on his conscience. The manly angst of it all powers one cheap melodramatic excess after another, and it would only take a slight twist of the script to render Godzilla #1 a highly effective satire of macho adventure fiction. And so, as you might now expect, there's a scene in which we see Boxer's horrified and silently screaming face contorted with pain at the death of the girl he was supposed to be protecting, as well as, yes, a panel in which he kneels down and tenderly holds her as she expires in his arm, and, yes, there's also a scene of his wife beating her hands against his chest while declaring "You should have been here ... She died because you weren't here." while he weeps over his own daughter. No sentimental cliche left to rot in its grave, no empty-hearted triteness willingly left unexploited. The few slight innovations on show, such as the social minorities who mostly serve in this first issue in the role of well-loved/much-missed victims, can't liven up what seems to be a once-more-round-the-block macho revenge fantasy. Though Swierczynski most certainly writes an ingenious set-piece based on Boxer and Gwen's attempts to escape the skyscraper they're trapped in, it's just a show pony of a sequence in the absence of anything of character mixed with the stifling presence of all that manliness.
But although Forty Stories Of Sheer Terror lacks much of originality and feeling in its script, there's certainly no lack of spirit and enthusiasm on the page. Gane's art is particularly impressive, a lavish and skillful celebration of all things monstrous and testosterone-soaked. At times, his pages suggest the work of an Art Adams who's as taken by the naive simplicity of ligne claire every bit as much as by the fetishistically detailed set-pieces of the Michael Golden/Marshall Rodgers school of superhero books. Simplicity and complexity sit together, the smartly naive and the sophisticated side by side. Complex cityscapes being flattened by Godzilla reveal, at second glance, the energetic, expressive freehand stylings of an artist determined not to bleed the life out his work by a literal minded pseudo-realism. Yet at a few key moments, the storytelling is hard to immediately follow. Is the reader looking at the ruined innards of a building whose four walls are still intact when Gwen and Boxer open the lift door? Why do the backgrounds of the frames showing Gwen's shooting become nothing but black when the reader could really do with knowing exactly where all the characters are in relation to each other and the setting? But at all times, there's an irrepressible good humour and energy about Gane's pages, and although that can chaff against the relentlessly dour ultramasulinity of the script, there's a great deal to savour in his inventive and purposeful artwork
The appeal of the new Godzilla title is a straight-forward one. The world order is collapsing, the Republic's government is incompetent, there's skyscraper-tall killer creatures destroying even the supposedly monster-resistant domiciles of the rich, but never fear. There are violent, angst-ridden, muscle-bound killers who've lost their significant others and are gathering to have their revenge. If you like poker-faced, shoulders-back super-lads fighting giant radioactive creatures, then this really is the book for you. Well, why not?
Reader's Roulette Rating; Some predominantly splendid places from Gage partially redeems what's really no more than some only-for-the-sweaty-vest-crew scripting by Swierczynski. One for the niche audiences only, I suspect, although Michael Bay could make a sweep-up-the-popcorn-movie-takings film out of it all.
.
Labels:
2012,
Blokeishness,
Duane Swierczynski,
Godzilla,
IDW,
Simon Gane
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





I much prefer the Marvel Godzilla series that pitted the King of the Monsters against SHIELD.
ReplyDeleteThat said, if IDW has the license, we're one step closer to a Doctor Who/Godzilla crossover. Roger Landridge should write it, obviously.
Hello Arkadin:- I love the idea of a Doctor Who/Godzilla crossover! It's not something that I'd ever thought, but the minute I read your suggestion, I knew that I'd buy that title! I can resist the sheer fannishness of the idea.
DeleteMr Landridge as writer sounds perfect to me. I'm a huge fan. I'm also a huge fan of Simon Gane's art, so he'd be a name to make me cheer too. He's got a variety of styles, as visitors to http://simongane.blogspot.co.uk/ can discover. I'd recommend a trip there, if folks haven't been there before.
The thing that annoys me about the Godzilla comics I've read is they're tonally opposite of what made the movies so great. Yeah, in the movies the monster is going around and flattening cities, but there's a humane and optimistic approach to it. Human drama centers around the Godzilla conflict and in the end the badguys die and if any of the good guys die its in order to atone for past sins by sacrificing themselves to stop the badguys.
ReplyDeleteJeff Powell's Godzilla comic was particularly frustrating as it was just "Godzilla and other monsters go around killing people's families and when those people attempt revenge it barely registers on those monsters' radars. The End." It was an ugly, bleak business with seemingly little point to show anything but how miserable Godzilla can make everything.
This Swierczynski comic sounds a bit better, because from the sound of it, it at least includes a protagonist we can follow, instead of just a bunch of miserable canon-fodder.
Hello Joe:- I fear I know very little of Godzilla, so I'd fully accept that that makes the above very much an outsider's point of view. I haven't seen a Godzilla movie since what used to be known as Saturday Morning Pictures in the early Seventies when I was nipper. (The Splendid Wife reports a similar experience over the other side of London, just as she reminds that the Brit comedy trio of the period had a Godzilla parody staring a giant kitten attacking London landmarks.) I'm grateful to you for the perspective of one who knows. Reading this tale, I couldn't help but feel how important it was to balance out the great unthinking creature with human personalities who were something more than thin stereotypes. Since the great monsters can obviously function as metaphors for any force beyond the individual's control, there's obviously a great opportunity to, as you say, create human dramas which do something more than roll out flat action tales.
DeleteBut there is undoubtedly a protagonist in this version of the character, and indeed a second "violent" man with a grudge against the monsters is introduced too. I hope it works for you.
Until this winter when I bought a box set of some of what's considered the best Godzilla movies, I hadn't seen a Godzilla movie since I was about 10 or 12, and I very much remember the human parts being boring but sticking through them just to see Godzilla kick some butt and knock over a few buildings. But over the winter I realized that the Godzilla films were way more than just a guy in a rubber suit mucking about. It made me look for some more sci-fi Toho films from that era, and I'm glad I did, cause there's a lot of really good stuff.
DeleteHello Joe:- I've just replied to your welcome comment about the Crank movies, in which I said that you and Harvey had made a property I'd never have considered seem interesting. Of course, this is obviously part of a concerted and kind-hearted attempt to help me fill in the blank spots of my pop culture knowledge. I suspect it's Godzilla ahoy now too ..
DeleteThough I do love the idea that "the Godzilla films were way more than just a guy in a rubber suit mucking about". Crikey, but THAT'S a job to have if you're of the right frame of mind.
This is a shame. Gane really was born to draw Godzilla as I think this book shows. Sadly the cliche ridden story could deprive him of getting a second chance as, somewhat unfairly, he'll carry half the blame if the book's a failure. For the time being I'll stick to my Trimpe Marvel Godzilla.
ReplyDeleteHello Peter:- I think it's safe to say that Gane will have his reputation greatly enhanced by what appears here, although I understand your concern for the future of such a gifted artist. I suspect that Godzilla will do fine for IDW, who traditionally have relatively low print runs and whose books have specific niche audiences. It's by no mean a bad comic, though, for a reader who shares anything of my perspective, it is a disappointing one.
DeleteI've read Rob Williams for one praising the artwork here. I suspect that Mr Gane will do very well. And it is worth pointing out, as I'm sure I don't need to, that my view of things doesn't tend to be a representative one. It could be abook which doesn't just do well in the 20 000 -40 000 range, but breaks right beyond that. And one "critic's" version of macho and dumbed down is another's good fun widescreen adventure :)
Having read it I don't think you misrepresented the cliche ridden story at all. It seems to be another example of a writer whose spent to much time trying to copy Hollywood blockbusters without the life experience to add interest to his writing and having nothing to say. Gane's design of the main character suggests to me he could see that and was attempting to introduce a degree of irony and commentary. Perhaps future issues will prove me wrong, this could be a very skilful piece of writing designed to set up a whole set of false expectations. I'll certainly check it out again.
DeleteHello Peter:- I'm relieved that you read the story in the same way. It's hard to find any wiggle-room for the "knowing" option, isn't it?
DeleteIf it is a brilliant misdirection, it's unfortunately forgotten to be brilliant for the folks who pick up the first issue and decide to go on or not because of that. So many modern-era creators forget that the individual issue will be read as a distinct experience. I wonder if that has happened here?
It's good to see such a professional take on this comic. I've been following IDW'a Godzilla comics since square one. I have been the definition of a 'fan' of this franchise for a long time. These comics are things Godzilla fans could appreciate the most. I do agree with a lot of points here. While it is an improvement over IDW's previous Godzilla outing, (Kingdom of Monsters) this series has to do a little work in order to become 'great.'
ReplyDeleteIn any case, here are my thoughts on the comic.
http://destroyers-editorialsandreviews.blogspot.com/2012/05/godzilla-1-review.html
Hello Destroyer14:- Thank you for the kind words. I'm trying to use these Readers Roulette pieces to tighten up how I deal with specific areas of my writing which need special attention above and beyond the need to improve. And things such as trying to describe just something of an artist's work in a paragraph are clearly skills which I need to work alot harder at. By which I mean, thanks for the generous words of encouragement.
DeleteI shall pop over and read your own review when I've finished this off. I've found my position isn't, shall I say, typical on the subject of Godzilla, which has, it seems tended to receive very high praise indeed. I'm looking forward to see where we agree, and don't :)
And having read your review, I must say, it's fascinating to read the response of someone who obviously is a big fan and knows their stuff. They make, if I may say, interesting counterpoints to each other.
DeleteLast year's John Layman/Alberto Ponticelli Godzilla book was pretty good. Later this year James Stokoe is having a crack at one. If Stokoe can't do justice to Godzilla, I don't know who can.
ReplyDeleteI always wonder about writers who write stuff like what you go over in this book. If you're not doing it satirically, why bother? I mean, Swierczynski couldn't have written those words without realizing how cliched they were, could he? I'm no great writer, but when I'm writing fiction and I reach a point where I could go that way, I'm very conscious of it and I try very hard to avoid it. I know it's easy, but I can't imagine writing a scene where a woman pounds on someone's chest and screams that. As I wrote it, I'd be thinking how stupid and trite it is. Swierczynski has written some good stuff, so he has to know how silly something like that is, right? I really hope you're missing the satire here,* because if it's as deadly serious as you say, there's no hope for it, is there?
* No, I don't. I am sure your reading of it is spot-on.
Hello Greg:- I'm certainly up for reading the Stokoe issues. I hope he wants to be as out-there as Orc Stain, and that if he does, IDW welcomes that. But whatever he writes, I'll be interested,
DeleteI really hope that I have missed the satire in Godzilla too! And I've read and re-read it to find any signs that it is anything other than serious. But if it is satire, it's satire without bite or knowing smile, and whatever's supposed to be satire is buried in every sign of blokeish fantasies. There are forward-thinking aspect to the tale; one of the "violent" men is gay and looses his husband during a wedding ceremony to a monster attack. Yet that's so embedded in a typical really-tough-guy-looses-his-lover-and-declares-vengeance trope that it doesn't seem to carry anything other than sentimentality. Even if the violent men turn out to be needleheads and the story a mocking of such characters, the first chapter is going to read as all set-up and no satire. If it is meant to be read with tongue-in-cheek, it's really not been done very well at all. It's all mawkishness and manlihood, but no ironic wink, no sense of conspiracy with the reader to recognise how by-the-book it all is. A shame, regardless of how later issues develop.
I'm still shocked, as of course are you, that there's the possibility that this material is supposed to be taken at face value. You'd think not, wouldn't you? Surely not.
Stokoe has some wonderful pages from his upcoming Goszilla book on his website which fill me full of hope.
DeleteHello Peter:- And guess where I'm off to right now ... ?
DeleteLooking at the sampled panels, it looks to me like the comic is an attempt at "Jason Statham vs. Godzilla" miniseries. Which inspires three thoughts:
ReplyDelete1. If it were Statham's character Chev Chelios from the Crank movies versus Godzilla, it would be a great, great comic. It would also be completely insane and over-the-top in a gloriously self-aware fashion. IDW should look into that. Chelios would drive an ice cream truck filled with RDX up the monster's cloaca and escape the explosion by squeezing out of the creature's nostrils. In the first six pages. Then it would get intense. I can see it now...
2. Given the title character's name of "Boxer," I hold out hope that later he will get into a fistfight with Godzilla. "Take that, monstrous toe!" WHAP!
3. This does not hold a candle to the greatest "celebrity versus Godzilla" comic of all time. Not even close.
Hello Harvey:- This is painful moment when I have to public ally own to not knowing what you're talking about, isn't it? Jason Statham is not a cultural icon that I've ever stumbled across. My head is hung, my face is red with shame at cultural ignorance ... Still, I think I get the sense of your point, and YES! Godzilla should have been played in exactly that spirit. In the end, it's a book which shortchanges everyone that isn't in love with the blokeishness of it all. And I really believe that that niche could have been served while providing everyone else with a touch more of heart and audacity.
DeleteI love the idea of a fight between Boxer and Godzilla. I also like the idea of Godzilla stepping on the violent man and flattening him. But if you want to stop Godzilla, you call for Reid Fleming, the world's toughest milkman.
Hang on. The greatest celebrity comic was written by Mike Baron & Alan Smithee? Someone rewrote Baron's script for a comic like that? You have to wonder what was in the original. Crikey, the world is an often perplexing place to live in.
Don't worry too much if you're not familiar with Jason Stathom. He's pretty much today's version of Arnold or Bruce and the quality of his movies very as much as those two's did. Jason was in the star in Transporter movie franchise which were decent blockbuster action movies (at least from what I remember), but the two Crank movies he was in were balls-out insane (in the best meaning of the phrase) and is both a parody of and loveletter to the macho action-hero.
DeleteHello Joe:- Thank you for the info. I have terrible holes in my pop culture 101 knowledge, and I'm not being snarky about that. I wish I did more, but time is so limited and it's hard enough to keep up with the material which threatens to be excellent while also appealing. Having said that, both Harvey & your words make me think that the Crank movies are well-worth a punt. So I'll be looking out for them. Huzzah!
DeleteYour review reminds me of the one of Swierczynski's novels I read. It was about a secret group of Hollywood elite who employed teams of unemployed actors, directors and writers as a murder squad to cover up potential scandals of their big name celebrity clients. So stupid...
ReplyDeleteBut the lead in that was a tough full of angst over the partner he'd failed and who died along with their family. And then the lead got to be all angsty over the woman he almost manages to save from the Hollywood Murder Crew...
Anyway, I'm not surprised to see his comic's work is as full of poorly written cliches and ludicrous plotting...
Hello lurkerwithout:- Well, that's fascinating stuff, it really is. These are obviously not uncharted waters for DS. Of course, no-one would quibble with a writer carving out a specific area to write within. But it doesn't make me in any way likely to read his work. I will admit, I've also struggled with Birds Of Prey by Mr Swierczynski. I suspect that the old line about "Those who like this kind of things will like this kind of thing" comes into play here.
Delete(Cover-Godzilla looks PISSED that someone blew up that building before he could)
ReplyDeleteThis is a weird one. A blokey-bloke superbloke veteran of the Special Bloke Service who has mad, rapail-down-cables Arnie action and swears "NOOOOOOOO!" revenge on giant monsters is the sort of character that can fit into a classic Godzilla story. (Some characters in these movies had that very "NOOOO" motivation, though none were Uber-blokes (Ublokes?)) He fits right in. It's all a question of tone. It's a character and story that needs to be played straight while not being quite straight and still a source of escapist action. (As Harvey says, maybe he actually does box Godzilla)
It sounds a bit too grimly serious for that. And this is not a character and plot that you can make grimly serious. You could do a more serious take but that means you can't have Boxer doing his super-bloke stuff at the start, he'd have to just be a regular action bloke. (Do a more serious take* and his character doesn't fit at all)
Tone is important in this sort of comic, or you end up wrong-type-of-silly.
- Charles RB
* Destroy All Monsters plays itself straight but the city smashing isn't really presented as serious, the film knows we want to see all the monsters fighting; Gorgo, Gorgo's Mum is destroying all London but we want her to cos the humans deserve it. Gamera 2 is the next stage up, the film is telling a story of Japan & Gamera having a genuine, serious-tactics war against alien invaders, but it's still out to thrill. Then you get the utterly grim and apocalyptic, the original Godzilla and Gamera 3, but the heroes there are 'little people' at the risk of being swept away.
Hello Charles:- I had a feeling that Godzilla was something you'd previous experience of, and I'm glad you added the above. For example, I didn't realise that there were such super-human violent men in the Godzilla movies. My memories from Saturday Morning Pictures are of soldiers and scientists. So I appreciate the context.
DeleteUblokes? Love it!
You're right to suggest that the serious tone undermines the playful masculinity of such scenes. In fact, it makes them anything but playful. Now, perhaps that will change next issue. But if so, it means that this first chapter has been a blown opportunity, because I'd be up for a somewhat tongue-in-cheek approach to such machismo. To be honest, the poor-dying-young-girl trope here was both sickly and uncomfortable.
Darn it, but now I find I actually WANT to see the movies you recommend in your closing paragraph. Oh, well, time to check the listings ...
Well, it's not that there were superblokes (there weren't), so much as there were these very odd, extreme character tropes in a number of the 60s thru 70s films, after Godzilla became a franchise rather than an allegory for devastation of WW2. Godzilla VS Gigan has a manga artist, his karate-warrior girlfriend, and a fat hippie as amateur detectives; Ghidrah has a princess possessed by an alien intelligence and pursued by a military assassin; Ebirah Horror Of The Deep has a laconic bank robber teaming up with go-go dancing teenagers; Terror of Mechagodzilla has an Interpol superspy and the cyborg woman who loves him.
ReplyDeleteSuper-Bloke is the sort of character you can see existing in that sort of film without seeming out of place.
(Once, when rewatching Gamera 2, I suddenly realised that The Times was in it, reporting that Gamera had fallen. That made my day.)
- Charles RB
Hello Charles:- Having a blog is like having access to a wonderful Think Tank. Thank you. By "superbloke", I guess I meant macho hero; thankfully you intuited my meaning :)
DeleteI so wish that this Godzilla number one had something as out-there as "a princess possessed by an alien intelligence and pursued by a military assassin"! That sounds like FUN! And it's FUN that I miss in this new book. You've got giant monsters and yet it's so GRIM and BUTCH. A "laconic bank robber teaming up with go-go dancing teenagers"? BRING IT ON!!!
"That sounds like FUN!"
DeleteAnd then Godzilla, Rodan, and Mothra have a diplomatic conference about whether to save the humans from the alien King Ghidorah/Ghidrah. I am not making this up.
- Charles RB
FANTASTIC!!!! Yes, I'll be watching that. The very idea is enthralling.
Delete"The Splendid Wife reports a similar experience over the other side of London, just as she reminds that the Brit comedy trio of the period had a Godzilla parody staring a giant kitten attacking London landmarks."
ReplyDeleteThe program would be The Goodies, with the episode being Kitten Kong. I believe the entire episode is available for viewing at various sites if you Google it.
Hello Ken:- And thank you for filling in the words which my typo-happy brain managed to somehow leave out of that sentence. You're an egg.
DeleteI guess no one is going to mention the typo in the title of your post. Oh, and this is the fourth comic from Reader's Roulette, not the third. I think you repeated "2.2" down the page a bit. Yes, I'm nitpicking. It's what I do!!!!
ReplyDeleteHello Greg:- Tell me the typo in the title, mate! If I'm word-blind, I need your able help :) Or is that the 4th not 3rd RR point? I'm assuming I've managed two in one title.
DeleteYou're quite right about the 4th and not 3rd piece. Mea culpa, many thanks. I'll amend that.
Greg:- as a token of appreciation, if you have the slightest interest in nominating a book to be given a look-over from tomorrow's releases, please do say. A bit of a kerfuffle, I will admit, but even as a gesture, I hope it expresses my thanks.
DeleteColin: "Swierczynski" is spelled wrong. You got it right in every other instance, but not the title!
ReplyDeleteAs for this week's books ... well, sir, I would tell you to get The Boy Who Made Silence collected edition, but it's $23 and I don't even know if you'll be able to find it. It's the first six issues of a planned 12-issue series, but they came out in 2008, so I'm not sure if the final ones will ever get published. It's a superb work of art, though, in case you come across it.
As for the single issues that are coming out ... The Massive #1 shows up, and that will probably be very cool. I'd love to see your take on The Secret History, because it's chock full of Igor Kordey's excellent artwork and each issue is something like 50 pages long, so it's full of stuff. The Spider seems to be getting some good reviews, and as I haven't picked up the first issue yet, I'd enjoy seeing something about issue #2. I'm really enjoying your thoughts on single issues!
Cheers, sir. Have a nice evening!
Hello Greg:- That's UNFORGIVABLE. I'm very glad for the catch. I'm incredibly self-conscious about spelling people's name right. Years of teaching in schools only accentuated how important it is to get the respectful fundamentals of name and correct pronunciation right from the off. Ach, I'm not pleased with myself.
DeleteWhen I was teaching, I learned to start off the year by explaining to students that I was a typo king, that it shamed me and that I wanted to be told each and every single mistake they found. It was counter-intuitive for them, I learned, because it seems they expected someone who did hit the typo-rocks regularly to shrug and say "it's just me". But I was taught as a boy in an educational culture where working on a student's English, and even the most basic aspects of it, was held to be a crime against humanity which crushed individual creativity while perpetuating authoritarianism. I managed to reach the second year of university before anyone ever mentioned essay structure, let alone what a sentence was. (Gawd bless Dr Kennedy, then of York University.) Thankfully I read so much that I absorbed some if not all that I needed through that, and it's a scandal that I always sailed through the system. But even now I wish I'd had some more cultural authoritarianism imposed upon me.
Is that an excuse? At 49? I fear not. But a frustration? I think so.
I'll add your welcome list of titles and one of them will appear in the next round. Thank you for nominating them. Heading off to titles I don't normally read and trying to trim more and more of the fat off the writing; it's all necessary, and I appreciate the editing and the nudges!
I hope the day ahead is a fine one. Perhaps one day I'll have the chance to stand you a cold glass of something splendid.
Hi Colin,
ReplyDeleteI'm the editor of this comic. First and foremost, thanks very much for taking the time and writing up a thoughtful review. Our intention with this comic was to make a classic action movie. Ideally a smart, fun action movie. It sounds like we fell short for you there. We did try to include a good amount of humor ("Currently: Trying to make poached eggs", "Why can't you curse like a normal person?" "Not my country, mate") to balance the more serious elements, but alas, it seems we didn't hit home for you there.
I'm glad you enjoyed Simon's art. He's a true talent, and he's just getting warmed up. I think we've got some exciting twists and turns to come in the story, but I know Simon's art always speaks for itself.
And indeed, I think it may be hard to over-hype Stokoe's upcoming book. It's definitely a different beast than this book, so perhaps it will be more your cup of tea.
Thanks for the review, and I hope you check out more of our books.
Hello Bobby:- Firstly, thank you for engaging in such a civil fashion. I'm not suggesting that the following was your cunning purpose, but the minute someone involves me in a conversation in which I'm treated as an equal rather than the enemy, I find myself wanting to read on in order to discover whether I've been fair or not. It always happens that way, and so, fair deal, I will circle back round and pick up Godzilla #2 and see how things play out. I would expect, with the loss which serves as the motivation of the characters established in #1, that the tone may well be lighter.
DeleteI'll not try to cover myself by explaining why I thought the humorous asides on the page didn't balance out the tone of the work for me. If I haven't explained myself in the above, then I've not done my "job" anyway.
As I'm sure you saw in the above comments, Mr Stokoe's Godzilla is placed securely in the top ranks of my must-buy books. Both that up-coming book and this very issue of Godzilla were comics which folks who pop into the blog recommended. I'd not realised that it was a property which such a considerable number of people are so interested in. Mea culpa. In terms of visitors, comments and e-mails, the popularity of Godzilla has really surprised me. It may not generate the likes of the 5000+ who popped in over a few days for the recent discussion of the use of torture in the superhero book, but it stirred up an unexpected response.
Thanks for popping over and for doing so as you did. The best of luck with your future endeavors!