Thursday, 23 August 2012

On Batman Incorporated #3 (Part 1)

    
The discipline and ambition of it all isn't in any way distracting. The audacity and the creative expertise isn't either. The story's everything. But it's impossible not to look back and wonder how the trick was worked. Why does Batman Incorporated #3 feel so satisfying as well as so much fun?

Some of it's down to Morrison and Burnham's urgent determination to simply not waste space. In that, Batman Incorporated #3 isn't a characteristically modern era comic book at all. It's a dense and ultimately affable Silver Age-esque tale, packed with incident, innovation and novelty. It doesn't presume that the reader's already committed to passively persevering with the story before them. Instead, it seems deeply concerned that its audience might at any moment be sinfully distracted by a host of other entertainments, and it's absolutely determined that that's not going to happen.

           
The post-Millennium super-book has so often been a corrosively bland, flaccid experience. Page upon page of ill-focused waffling slapped over dull, repetitive visuals. Page after page of mostly textless spectacle, reliant upon all those strange hyper-muscled, manically-rendered obsessions which we've learned to associate with locked-in fanboy syndrome. But Morrison and Burnham, among all too few of their peers, are obviously saturated with the knowledge of  how the comic book used to hook and snare its readers. And so, to name but one example, they pay forensic attention to the apparently not-so-obvious fact that panels have backgrounds as well as foregrounds, and they're enthusiastic in manipulating the relationship the two in order to fascinate the reader.

        
Where Morrison's speech bubbles are carrying things forward in a way that's not immediately compelling, Burnham's art is either imaginatively complimenting the text or offering a beguiling if not overly-distracting counter-narrative. When Alfred's called upon to deliver a mass of exposition about "Professor Pyg's pharmaceutical breakthroughs", he's also shown assiduously grooming the unlikely figure of the Bat-Cow. Where Wayne's reminding the longterm reader of how all Morrison's plot-seeding is finally coming to fruition, Burnham's delivering a marvellously complex and enticing diagram showing colourful aspects of the series' complex back-story. Each panel in turn is both an experience in its own right as well as an essential part of the story as a whole. That's as it should be, of course, and yet even in an enlightened age, Batman Incorporated #3 would be an exceptionally fine piece of work.

        
But then, The Hanged Man is very much not a product of the age. There's no machismo, no adoration of the hyper-masculine here. Body's aren't traumatically run through, which soapy angst and nihilism are conspicuous by their absence. There's certainly never any pretence in either Morrison's script or Burnham's art that the Batman's somehow real, or even a realistic proposition. This is unashamed fantasy, and it's all the more a pleasure because of being so. This Dark Knight has his moments of representing fearsome, other-worldly qualities, but he's far more often a wonderful, playful conspiracy acted out against the underworld by Bruce Wayne. He's undoubtedly immensely powerful, and yet anything but invulnerable and self-obsessed. Even when disguised as the petty criminal Matches Malone, Wayne's ridiculously huge, mouth-isolating chin dominates the scene, as if to encourage the reader to smile fondly at these over the-top morality tales and their wonderfully ridiculous, magical protagonists.

         
Burnham's take on Wayne himself seems to strangely suggest a small lad who's jumped from boyhood into uber-maliness without any of the inconvenience of the intervening years. What could be more appropriate for the Darknight Detective, who never did grow up in the aftermath of his parent's murder? In an interesting reversal of roles, it's actually Damian who emerges in The Hanged Man as the voice of suspicion and caution, his fundamental adoration of his father expressing itself as an almost-patriarchal concern. As such, the story's both a knowing celebration of pulpish blokeishness and a fond, wry smile at the silliness of the same. In the end, it's the clearly pre-pubescent, physically unimposing super-lad in the spray-painted scarlet-and-black helmet who has to take on both brutes and guard dogs alike, and neither Morrison or Burnham has the slightest interest in accentuating the real-world, street-fighting verisimilitude of the scene.

         
This is very much not testosterone-triggering comfort reading for the perpetually ladoholic. This is fun, and if the reader wants to take this material and turn its playfully seedy bars and faux-surreal conspiracies into a dark, fearsome and joyless world, then the material will just about bear the interpretation. Yet in between the super-computers of the perpetually crepuscular Bat-Cave, there's a cow who appears to be wearing a superhero mask and a loyal enabling ex-S.A.S. man caring to its every need.

         

to be concluded, with a look at the qualities which make the third issue of the comic more satisfying to a blogger who felt just a touch less enthusiastic - see here - about the first two issues of the book;

10 comments:

  1. There are no words to adequately express my love for the Bat-Cow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Sally:- I would buy a Bat-Cow monthly. I really would.

      And I'd buy a Bat-Cow monthly team-up mag too. Bat-Cow and Ace, and Streaky, and Krypto, and Beppo, and Comet, and Proty, and Rex ....

      Delete
  2. I see that others have already gotten to it, but I would be remiss if I didn't take the time to say: Bat-Cow! Oh my god, guys, BAT-COW!

    And I suppose some other stuff happens, too... :)

    I think that these last three issues of Morrison's Batman have been the ones I've enjoyed the most (and a lot of that comes down to Burnham). In particular the last two issues have been great reads. #1 was great as well, but it definitely felt like two creators showing off and mugging for applause. Which is fine when you have two creators who have the chops to make "hey, look at me!" be an entertaining and educational read. But thankfully they've toned it down from there; they came out of a gate with a bang and showed everybody exactly what they could do as clearly as possible, and then got down to doing their thing without constantly reaffirming to the audience that they have something to prove.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Adam:- I love Bat-Cow, because it's a sign that we're NOT SUPPOSED TO NEED TO TAKE THIS STUFF SERIOUSLY. Or at least, we can take things seriously and we can do the opposite at the same time.

      One panel of Alfred and Bat-Cow made a very good comic a great one.

      The third issue really did feel as a good series had hit its stride. It was far less kinetic, far less frantic, and better because of it.

      Delete
  3. Hello Colin, this book really is the knees of the bee. The heroes actually seem to be having fun - how long before Damian rides Bat-Cow into battle?

    Or eats her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Martin:- Yep, the knees of the bees have been clearly revealed here, and they deserve enthusiastic support. I'm just sitting down trying to work out why this book feels so much better than previous, and undoubtedly good, issues in the run. The very fact I'm chin-stroking about that shows how highly I regard it.

      Damian forced to eat Bat-Cow? That sounds like a plot-idea for other, less admirable, shock--schlock Bat-titles.

      Delete
  4. Hey Colin, had to pop in when I saw a Batman Inc #3 post. I saved this issue for last this week, and I wasn't disappointed. Actually, I almost didn't save it for last, just because I had to work so hard to slog through the other books in my pile (in my defence, the vast majority of those books were loaned to me by a friend. I try not to make a habit of having less than enjoyable books on my own pull list, the ever underwhelming "Batman" title notwithstanding).

    I like the reading of the design of Bruce as a kid miraculously finding himself in an adult body, not just because of the questionable new Captain Marvel over in the pages of Justice League, but also because it gets me to re-evaluate that ONE aspect of Burnham's art that I didn't care for, his Bruce Wayne, and make that weakness a strength.

    Now to wait however long until issue 4. I guess I could look it up and spare myself some suspence.

    And yes, three cheers for Bat-Cow and Damian's love of said cow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Isaac:- I'm really pleased that we're able to sing enthusiastically from the same hymn sheet here. I really loved it, and it's always such a relief to be able to say that.

      Thank you for saying there's some small merit to the idea of Big Bruce as really being Little Bruce, the lad who grew out without truly growing up. I often feel daft proposing such things, and yet, it's a blog about comics; why not share a few playful ideas?

      I'm struggling with the new Captain Marvel too. I far prefer the take on the character in Young Justice.

      Is there anyone who doesn't love Bat-Cow and Damian? I'm not sure such a person could be regarded as trustworthy.

      Delete
  5. Colin,

    I had never really thought about it before, but the idea of Bruce never really...growing up, has a certain merit. It is as though he's been frozen at the moment he saw his parents murdered. Everything and I mean EVERYTHING that he has done since then, has been in their memory, or to avenge them, or whatever. Most people have traumas in their lives, but manage to grow and overcome them. Bruce never really has, and since he had the financial advantage of being able to do something about it, and the singleness of mind, he was able to realize his dream...which is pretty juvenile, when you actually sit down and think about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Sally:- Absolutely. This version of Bruce didn't grow up into an adult, but into a child's vision of what an adult would be. He's only part of a person, and yet what's there absorbs all of his remarkable energy and talent. Most of everything that would have been typical has been swapped for power and competence. Now Bruce's the bloke who could have saved his parents while making sure that Joe Chill never escaped to threaten anyone again.

      It's one of my favourite takes on the Batman. I'm sure I've read others expressing a similar belief about Bats in general. But here Burnham perfectly walks the line between accentuating the boy and expressing his strength too.

      It makes sense of Bruce to me in a way that I'm not sure any other take has suggested, regardless of what CB actually meant. It makes me love Bruce and fear him a little too.

      Delete