Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Trying To Make A Super-Star Out Of An Ant-Man


It seems that there really will be a E-Book by yours truly containing some pieces - original and re-worked - on the first few years of the Marvel Universe appearing later this year. Never having done anything of the sort, it's proving to be an interesting, if somewhat nerve-wracking, process. Given that I've been at something of a loss for what to do next following the completion of my original target of 10 000 hours writing on the blog, the E-book's a project that's arrived just at the right time. Though I'll be shifting back to paying far more attention to contemporary comics from this point onwards here at TooBusyThinking, the time invested in grappling with the product of the long-lost Sixties has proven unexpectedly inspiring. By that, I don't mean that I'd imagined spending time with the earliest of Marvel's super-books would prove to be anything other than fascinating. Yet the comics of the period never seem to run out of qualities which are as surprising as they're captivating, and that's true no matter how often those books have been read.


And so, I've been re-reading the earliest of Janet Van Dyne and Hank Pym's adventures for the two-part piece on the Wasp which began at Sequart this week - here - and that's really hammered home the speed at which Marvel's earliest superhero features were constantly being redeveloped. To know that there was little of a status quo in the earliest of the company's super-books is one thing. But to sit down and note such changes one by one is to be forced to reappraise once more just how fluid, ambitious and unprecious Lee, Kirby, Ditko et al's approach was. It's not just that things which didn't seem to be working were swiftly changed, but that often entirely successful strips were fundamentally reworked. Peter Parker could have presumably stayed in high school forever, for example, and yet, in less than three years, he'd graduated and left most of his supporting cast behind.

Below are just some of the changes which affected Henry Pym during the 35 months in which he was the co-star of one of Tales To Astonish's lead feature. Considering that most of those tales were short features of mostly 12 or so pages, that's a hectic degree of innovation.

The novelty which pseudo-tech could offer was constantly evoked throughout Pym's few years as a lead character. In the above, from Ant-Man's first appearance in Tales To Astonish #35, Pym's chemical-induced ability to change size was matched to his ability to construct kid-enrapturing, crime-fighting hardware.  
One month later and Pym's "secret headquarters" was revealed, which we've discussed here at TooBusy before.
Two months passed and Lee, Kirby & Leiber were already attempting to amp-up Pym's physical capabilities. In TTA~38,  the character was given "electronically controlled spring(s)" in his heels, as well as a "lasso ... (made of ) ... nylon fibre which is practically unbreakable". Never seen again, it did allow Pym to swing hapless criminals around his tiny head.
Five months passed - the equal-longest period without significant change in the history of the strip - and the most fundamental shake-up in any of Marvel's first wave features arrived. Pym's back-story was expanded to include a previously-unmentioned Hungarian-American wife who'd been murdered by Red agents during their honeymoon, as well as a new sidekick to both mentor and fall in love with. Just to make things even more psychologically febrile, the Wasp was the spitting image of the dead Maria Pym. (The changes to the Wasp over this period will be something I'm going to take the chance to discuss next week.)
Four months later,  Lee and Kirby supplemented Pym's ability to shrink with the capacity to do the opposite, replacing the gas which had previously triggered such changes with liquid-filled capsules. In doing so, they rebranded the character as "Giant-Man", a complete reversal of Pym's original USP. The strip's capacity to absorb one changed premise after another would lead to a long period during which Pym would operate at both giant and ant-size, an ability which he apparently never choose to share with his crime-fighting partner.
Two months later and the finest tale of Pym's early career appeared. With the first chapter inked by Steve Ditko and the second by Dick Ayers, Stan Lee and Jack Kirby portrayed Pym as a manic, brittle personality utterly obsessed with proving himself as a superhero when faced with the crime-spree of the Human Top. (TTA #50/1) As you can see from the panels above, Pym was now supplementing the capsules he used to change sizes with a "chemical energizer" which was designed to "increase (his) speed" too. So began a process by which Pym started to take on aspects of other character's abilities too. Here he was attempting to synthesise the speed of a Spider-Man if not a Quicksilver, though his was always a second-rate, tech-boosted version of the qualities which other super-people possessed. As such, Pym started to disappear under his own failure to be a character in his own right, while presenting the impression of being a chemical adventurer to match DC's Hourman.
Three months pass and Stan Lee and Dick Ayers now start to play up Giant-Man's abilities as a super-sized gymnast. Pym's apparently uncontrollable attempts to make himself both formidable and more dashing lead him to create a fake-flagpole bearing a "powerful tension-cable" known as a "sky-hook" which allowed him to reach the street from his apartment as quickly as possible. Having proven to be clumsy and quite frankly dangerous as a giant in the Human Top two-part tale, Pym now becomes a constantly-practicing super-acrobat capable of following Spider-Man across the rooftops. (TTA#55)
Two months after that, in TTA#58, and Pym develops the ability able to change size through the use of the "cybernetic nerve centre" in his mask, which could also trigger size-changes in the Wasp. (Again, no such reciprocal arrangement was ever mentioned.) It's odd that Pym never thought to add "stingers" such as the Wasp had been given, but it's hard not to believe that he was so fixated on his own masculinity that only-fisticuffs would do. Still, now the pills and potions are a thing of the past, which oddly enough makes the character seem less impressive, though more ethically defensible. When a super-power becomes something which can be achieved without the slightest degree of sweat, it tends to become far less compelling a quality.
In the following issue, not only iwas Pym presented facing down the Hulk and quite comfortably surviving, but also shown starring in a 5-page "bonus feature" which described his many abilities and technological advantages. A device for hauling him up the sides of skyscrapers was described, as well as a ant-drawn chariot, while his endless gymnastics and weight training was emphasised. As was quite fitting where the constant inflation of Pym's powers and resources was concerned, his tiny hidden-in-the-wall HQ was here replaced by a huge penthouse base. In it, there's even a gym for Giant-Man, though no sign of a similar training base for his other, teensy-weensy identity to train in. (Art by Dick Ayers and Paul Reinman, TTA#59)
A relatively stable five months passed and, with the strip just five more issues from being cancelled, Pym's costume is re-designed, as shown here in a frame from TTA#65 by Bob Powell and Don Heck. With all his time spent being blokeish, the responsibility for the new super-suit devolved upon the Wasp.
Then, in Pym's penultimate appearance just four months afterwards, the emphasis changed from adding power and skill to accentuating a possibly-fatal limitation. Although it was always a given that there were limits to Pym's ability to grow and remain strong and healthy, here the consequences of ignoring that is accentuated. In this scene from TTA#68 by Stan Lee, Bob Powell and Vince Colleta, the roots of the various size-changing crises which would strike Pym in coming years were clearly shown. (His return to the page in The Avengers during 1966 would find him trapped at giant-size for a protracted period.)
Finally, and just to show that the innovation - for good or ill - never stopped even in the pages of a cancelled strip, Pym's last starring appearance in TTA - #69, July '65 - saw him increasing the size of a wasp until he could ride over it over New York City. It was yet another significant increase in his abilities which later incarnations of the character often simply ignored. (By Lee, Hartley, Powell and Giunta.)
  
Next, TooBusyThinking will be returning to the 21st Century ...

20 comments:

  1. It's way, way off in the future yet, but I always really liked the Dr. Pym idea, that he carried a gigantic array of shrunken tools and gadgets on his person, which he could blow up to normal--or, presumably, giant--size as required. It was a nifty variation on the idea of intelligence itself as a super-power, and suited Pym both as one of the world's great intellects, and also as someone trying to get away from the whole Ant-Man / Giant-Man / Yellow Jacket thing.

    On creating Giwasp Woman, to be charitable Pym may have sought to protect Jan from the dangers of constantly changing sizes in all directions. A more likely explanation is that giant size and strength seemed a 'masculine' power back in the day and thus it may not have even occurred to Lee et al to go in that direction. Jan's stingers would have been more the thing; dudes used their fists, women generally had range weapons; Marvel Girl's telekinesis, Sue Storm's force projection, Medusa's hair (admittedly a grappling weapon, but still a distance one), etc.

    DC, of course, had Wonder Woman and Supergirl, but I can't necessarily think of any Marvel female characters with hand to hand powers until the '70s. There might be some, but I'm not thinking of any off the top of my head. Black Widow, maybe, but she had stingers too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Ken:- I thought that Pym's rehabilitation under Steve Englehart was one of the few really good things about his West Coast Avengers run, and you're right, he'd obviously done his research, or had a good memory, when it came to the powers of "Dr Pym". In fact, it was probably too great an ability for most writers to handle, though I've seen some use of the same conventions in recent years. Yet Englehart made it work without making the reader wondering why the character hadn't just shrunk a helicarrier and an army of re-wired Sentinels down in order to deal with all comers.

      You're point about the way in which super-powers were distributed according to gender is a good one, of course. I always find it interesting to note how the culture of a time affects the content of stories, or at least, appears to. I'm trying to think of the first Marvel female super-hero of any sorts who had strength and force as their power-set. The Valkyrie? Thundra, albeit as a sympathetic anti-hero. It certainly took a long time...

      Delete
    2. She didn't have superstrength, but Tigra was one of the first Marvel heroines whose fighting style was explicitly physical, hand to hand in nature. Her early feral persona and beclawed fighting style, ala Wolverine, was a marked break with the way Marvel females had fought up to then.

      Ms. Marvel might have been the first 'star' female character at Marvel who was basically a brawler.

      Delete
    3. The "Dr. Pym" persona was one of those subtle ones that could work amazingly well with a good, clever writer, and thuddingly clumsily with a mediocre one, ala taking Green Lantern and just having him make big green machine guns all the time.

      As for why Pym wouldn't shrink down helicarriers or Sentinals, a) he wouldn't have the money to score such things (say he got a million bucks a year to buy gear from the Avengers general fund, or bought his stuff personally with the proceeds from his patents; that would provide for a lot of stuff but not zanily expensive items) and b) the whole point of his attempting to refashion himself into a 'intelligence as superpower' guy would argue against his just whipping overwhelming force out of his breast pocket all the time. The whole point of the exercise would be the value of brain over brawn, incredibly exact and expert applications of minimal force.

      Delete
    4. Hello Ken:- As an old-school Defenders fan, I have a tendency to believe - perhaps despite the facts :) - that the Valkyrie came first as something of a powerhouse, though she did still have that sword. So there may well be a great deal for your case that Tigra - or shall we say the short-lived Cat? - was the first female super-hero/ine who lived and died largely through hand to hand combat? Shanna would've been another from the same brief-lived wave of female-led book circa 72/3.

      I'm certainly struggling to remember any others ... (sound of chin-stroking ....)

      Delete
    5. Mantis arrived just a little after the Cat & Shanna.

      Although if Colin is including Valkyrie, then surely Sif is the first female brawler?

      Delete
    6. Hello Ken:- I couldn't agree more. As James Robinson and Roy Thomas showed us with the Red Bee, there's no such thing as a character whose power-set dooms them to not be fascinating. It's how the powers are used, or in the Red Bee's case, how the daft premise is put to use. In Pym's case, a poor writer would indeed stuff his pockets full of heli-carriers and the like.

      I would totally agree with your reasons why Pym should be used sensibly. I'm not sure the industry is well known for always approaching things in such a sensible way :)

      Delete
    7. Hello Michael:- Hats off, Mantis is a good catch, and Sif looks to me like the best modern-era "brawler".

      There's an irony, I suspect, in the fact that characters such as the Black Canary were thumping characters in the Golden Age. Odd that when Black Canary was brought over to Earth-One and the JLA, she suddenly developed the canary call, which served as another way of fighting at a distance.

      I'm sure there's many other Golden Age examples of such. But my knowledge there is decidedly patchy, to say the least. The likes of Namorita I've some knowledge of, but the fightin' super-heroines of the pre-Silver Age period is not a Mastermind subject for this old head to jump at ...

      Delete
    8. Colin, in the Golden Age, heroines were more likely to resort to fisticuffs; it wasn't until the Silver Age that they could resolve conflicts by harnessing the power of radioactive spleens. Marvel's Golden Age heroines like Golden Girl, Miss America, Namora, Sun Girl & the Blonde Phantom... even occasionally Venus! ...would cuff their foes fairly often.

      Where the difference between they & DC's heroines lies is that Wonder Woman never went out of print and Hawkgirl & Black Canary received Silver Age revivals; some of the Marvel heroines were actively denied existence for a period (Golden Girl), while others were killed off-panel (Miss America, Namora). Even today, while Namora & Venus have had successful revivals, the other Golden Age Marvel heroines remain obscure and mostly forgotten.

      Delete
    9. Hello Michael:- Thank you for confirming and explaining my vague, vague suspicion. And that's also a fascinating point you make about Marvel ignoring its own female Golden Age characters. When even the likes of the Fin and the Thin Man were getting Bronze Age page-time, Sun Girl was indeed passing - to my knowledge - unmentioned. Now that is strange, or perhaps more worryingly, not strange but rather predictable.

      And of course, it's Namora when it's the Golden Age :)

      Delete
  2. Trying to make a mountain out of an Anthill?

    This is pretty much how I read the title anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello George:- I think you read a better title than the one I stumbled into. And yours sums up poor Pym's struggles too, although those endless struggles do make the character a far more interesting one than he might have otherwise been.

      Delete
  3. Got to love Ant-Man/Giant-Man/Yellowjacket and his wonderful, winsome Wasp.
    I think Ive read my Essential Ant/Giant Man edition four times now all the way thru, thats how much it means to me.
    The simplicity pf these early tales has akways held a charm for me. Its a bit bittersweet in light of how Hank and Jan have been portrayed as a deeply disfunctional =ex= married couple.
    Fine nostalgic reading. Happier Times. Simpler times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Karl;- My copy of the Essential Ant-Man has been similarly well-thumbed, though I must admit, the more I read those tales, the more the dysfunctional nature of Jan and Hank's relationship seems to have been there since day one. Which isn't to say that I think the Shooterisation of the character was a good and inevitable step. Just that from the very moment a still-traumatised Hank meets a naive teenager who looks just like his ex-wife, and then adopts her as his sidekick/student on the day her father is murdered, things were always likely to go at least a little wrong.

      I do enjoy reading those stories with part of my mind in the 60s and part in the now. On the one hand, as you say, fine nostalgic reading. On the other, there's a sense of impending disaster with every tale that's read and passed ...

      Delete
  4. Happy belated birthday, Colin! I hope you had a wonderful day.

    Ant-Man... it's interesting that Stan & Co. realized they had a dud on their hands and sort of acknowledged it in the comic. I'm surprised the character stuck around as long as he did. I'm curious as to why they didn't cancel Ant-Man instead of constantly revise him. Maybe sales were just good enough?

    It's too bad Pym was damaged so badly. I read Dan Slott's run on Mighty Avengers recently, and it read as if Slott was trying his best to make Pym Reed Richards 2.0. Pym could do just about anything, and characters spent page after page singing his virtues. In the last few issues of the series, Pym messed up and the team deserted him. It seems Pym's loser status still can't be overcome.

    I like Pym's role in Avengers Initiative/ Academy, but it stems from his being damaged goods. I like the idea that Pym keeps trying, but maybe it's time to either phase him out or tell a story about him that doesn't involve redemption.

    - Mike Loughlin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mike:- Thank you, the day of the dreaded 50th was a surprisingly splendid day.

      I'm curious about why Pym wasn't just kicked into touch. I'm just reading The JKC's The Wonder Years which says that Ant-Man's solo tales got poor sales from the start. I assume that there was always the chance that OK sales might gradually develop upwards, although The Wonder Years also declares that Kirby had several times been heard hoping to never have to plot and draw Pym's feature again. With JK in Pym's corner, it's doubtful anyone at Marvel could've saved him.

      There have been moments when I've popped into Mighty Avengers and Avengers Academy and been pleased to note a flawed and yet admirable Pym on display. At other times, as you say, it seems as if he's doomed to be Marvel's heroic under-achiever, though I'm told things have been different in the Academy book as a whole. It's a book which I've told I ought to read from the off, so I guess that I should :) Yet if it is - and I've always found your opinion entirely trust-worthy - playing off his "damaged goods" status, then I think I'll be quickly opting out. A creator at Marvel has a tough job with Pym. Being true to the character means being true to all the poor choices that Pym's been lumbered with, since the first appearance of Yellowjacket onwards. Yet, as you imply, there are characters who might just benefit from achieving a measure of redemption and having the chance to just BE for a while.

      Delete
  5. Ebook. When is it out and when can I get a copy for my kindle?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Peter:- Thank you for asking, You are an egg. Details are still being discussed, though things like covers and word limitations and indeed final deadlines are tightening up.

      It's all very interesting to see the process falling together. The thing I most like is the slight and yet still interesting insight it gives towards the experiences of those folks who really are - if you catch my meaning, as I hope you will - writers.

      Delete
    2. ...And will this ebook be available for purchase at institutions? Institutions such as the one I purchase on behalf of?

      Delete
    3. Hello Michael:- That's very kind of you to even ask. The ebook would be through Sequart. I shall forward your question to the folks there.

      Delete